How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

topic posted Tue, September 30, 2008 - 5:55 PM by  sherpa
Share/Save/Bookmark
There are so many ways in which people relate to astrology and more aptly, relate with their often distorted perceptions of what astrology is. How socially acceptable is astrology in your life ? Amongst your friends or maybe at a party, do you find yourself talking openly about astrology ? Or do you keep it to yourself for dread of starting an argument or a scene with any of the many "astrology skeptics" out there who believe it's all bunk or worse yet, "the work of the Devil" ? And when confronted by these skeptics and fundamentalist naysayers, what do you do or say ?
posted by:
sherpa
SF Bay Area
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Tue, September 30, 2008 - 6:09 PM
    I talk about it with the few I know are interested. The rest ~ pfft. That is one of the reasons I am posting here. I wanted to find people with whom I could talk about my interest. There is an extreme poverty of interested parties in my narrow world. So, I found a larger world where it is all cool. No problems.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Tue, September 30, 2008 - 6:17 PM
      I usually quickly assertain other people's sun sign, rising sign...moon sign....mull it for a few minutes and put it into mention storage and never talk about it again, except in jest, as if I were having a meaningful conversation about something.

      Thus, my presence here.

      :)

      Oh, and Sherpa: you are the saving grace for Scorpio Males. I genuinely appreciate your contributions here.

      ~V~
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Tue, September 30, 2008 - 6:11 PM
    When i was seven I tried to bring my mother's taro deck out to "do fortunes" and was informed about the people who believe all sorts of things are of the devil including tv. In middle school (early 90s) I was lectured for an hour and a half for reading Buckman's complete Book of Witchcraft n Science class (I was reading about making ritual knives and sewing projects) At that time informed that people's parents had been calling to complain about me, mostly because I had written the seal of jupiter on a very sweet sag boys hand and he happened to be mormon. I've never really understood it. Most of the people I usually hang with have at least a basic understanding and I can talk about it freely at most of the parties.
    I avoid bringing it up at my school. i considered advertising astrological services in my daughters elementary school yellow pages, but am too afraid, it's still a little marginal and repugnant to the heavily religious and has a stigma similar to if i were advertising some sort of ministry, I think.
    I have had it come up with people who are talking shit about it and I hint that they perhaps could look further into it than they have. Usually before I even say anything something to the tune of "maybe i was digging myself a whole just there" comes out of their mouths. This has happened once in the past five years or so anyway. I usually don't mention these things away from my sheltered little circle or people who have the capability of understanding or being interested in topics of discussion outside the "norm."
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Tue, September 30, 2008 - 8:52 PM
      i think you needed to think a little more slyly, that's all. "Half Moon Tea House" carries quite a bit of meaning without looking at it too closely. And even then. I think maybe you should relax and let your imagination help.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Tue, September 30, 2008 - 7:20 PM
    I get the feeling that more people are interested in astrology than what one would believe. I say "interested" because it can cover a wide range of perceptions, from the believers to the skeptical to the curious etc.
    I'd always thought my mom thought it was all bunk until recently. She has a healthy interest in it. I'm not sure if she completely believes in it per say, but she likes to know about placements and signs etc. She's a Libra.
    I think talking about astrology is a bit like talking about religion. Whenever someone has faith in something, there is the precarious dilemma of stepping on some toes. But for those who attack it as fanciful, evil etc. I always point out (for Christians in particular) that religion is filled with stories about sex, incest, wrestling with angels, burning bushes, fire and brimstone, talking donkeys, parting waters, bread from stone etc. So, it's really a matter of what significance we get out of something (i.e. what we put "faith" into).
    As with everything, when people become so sure about how "right" they are about something...they become fundamentalists (that's not just for religion). Fundamentalist lash out at others (sometimes in violent ways) in order to assert this "rightness" out of fear that perhaps...they may be wrong, mistaken.
    I think I'm rambling. I apologize.

    Peace, Bo
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Tue, September 30, 2008 - 8:47 PM
      Some of us grew up in religious homes where sins and hell ruled the day (they were, in fact, taken down mathematically. one point for sin, one point for heaven. do this that and the other thing, you get this point -- like counting calories lol). Makes you an Atheist, it what it does.

      But when you're certain by 3 yrs of age that we incarnate, that we wear a suit to face another brave new life, how do you begin to explain?? When I moved to a world that actually had libraries on ESP and Witchcraft and all things 'unknown,' I thought I died and went to the real heaven.

      Ironically, astrology helped me become more religious, more Goddess-aware, anyway. I began as an atheist and discovered a map to 'God.' Some find it in science, or love, or a feeling with all. I find crumbs that form a map that beckons 'here's the way, you're just fine ;-) That's what Astrology has done for me.
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Tue, September 30, 2008 - 8:55 PM
        Currently,

        I do not discuss astrology with people who I don't trust or like or just met. When the subject starts, e.g. my overzealous sister wants to be popular and I'm her currency, and I actually oblige (a few beers, maybe), then I feel dirty. That's why I prefer this forum and feel a bit protective of it.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Tue, September 30, 2008 - 9:01 PM
    I get some respect for it, but also a lot of laughter, which has made me sensitive to talking about it openly. To some people it sounds bizarre but they laugh because of that whole naive New Age stereotype.. But I have progressive friends for the most part.

    It's funny, when I think about people who've laughed at it, they're usually arrogant types who think they have the answer to everything--so basically, people who aren't spiritually aware, because to be aware you have to sense the underlying energy in things and your part in it, and if you can do that, you can be amazed at how accurate astrology can be.

    But I also have to go with what was said earlier---overall, more people are curious than they admit, and especially after you guess things in them, even if its just a correct element.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Wed, October 1, 2008 - 8:19 PM
      <overall, more people are curious than they admit, and especially after you guess things in them, even if its just a correct element.?

      when I guessed someone's solar sign based on the squareness of his head...(aquarian) it blew his mind...

      particularly because it had nothing to do with his personality. I don't attempt such parlor tricks often...but that time it worked. And he never wanted to talk about the topic again...while not discounting it.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Tue, September 30, 2008 - 9:05 PM
    I really don't understand the big deal or sneaking around. You discuss it with like-minds, and not with others. Where's the problem?

    And I am kind of surprised by you, sherpa. I mean do you really care? Shoot why would you?

    Ain't nobody's business but your own.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Tue, September 30, 2008 - 9:36 PM
      Intelligent Design is a politically charged term that makes most of my "liberal" friends cringe or snicker. I, on the other hand, associate it with astrology.

      I'm generally cautious about who I'll bring up astrology around, but when I make a strong astrological association with a topic of conversation, I'll often express it, with gentle disclaimers or deference to those who may roll their eyes. I'll begin with something like, "well, from an astrological prespective," or, "an astrologer might see this as . . ."
      I happens fairly often among "secular" people, and never labor the point. As often as not, I'll find that I'm speaking with someone who is at least curious about the astro view of the subject.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Tue, September 30, 2008 - 10:49 PM
      <<And I am kind of surprised by you, sherpa. I mean do you really care? Shoot why would you? >>

      I'm glad you are still capable of being surprised by me.

      Truth is, I am deeply interested in people and the larger social context of existence. the sociological trends and collective shifts going on right where we are sitting now impact us all on some level. i have noticed that astrology as a language has the power to equally unite and divide people, depending on divergent beliefs systems and how open or closed a mind can be to differing views.

      my original reason for getting into astrology was social, not intellectual or spiritual or for self-knowledge or anything mystical or metaphysical. as a twenty-something self-confessed 'social idiot,' i studied astrology to find ways to help me get along with a greater variety of people. by understanding something of the struggles of others, which could easily be seen in their charts, I found some comfort as another person struggling in a world where survival makes demands of us all every day.
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Wed, October 1, 2008 - 3:39 AM
        I am sure you offer many surprises.

        Well, perhaps it is an East Coast thing, as mem suggests. I usually meet with a dismissive chuckle or glazed eyes when the topic of astrology comes up in these quarters. Most people in this hustle bustle place don't have the time, patience, or interest to look into astrology. I know a couple of people who are interested, but I doubt they even know about the vertex.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 12:09 AM
    Fairly widespread appreciation in my circles, I think.
    The majority of people I talk to use Sun Signs (still as the be-all-end-all) as a way of getting to know people socially, at least once in the times I've met them....
    A decent percentage, though, get a bit more in depth, and start talking ascendants, planets, etc. These conversations tend to surface naturally... Esoteric discussion in general is fairly standard.
    I'll often/semi-often use Astrological correspondences for an example. Sometimes I wonder about what my reasoning for doing so was, but hey, planting seeds, planting seeds.

    I have at least a couple Astrologer friends. One comes immediately to mind.
    I so, so rarely meet fundamentalists... when I do, Astrology doesn't surface, and I don't push it.

    I think the vast majority of the people I talk to regularly have a far deeper interest in Mayan Astrology than Classical Western.
    I enjoy the ability to find correspondences and share other systems, deepening the portrait of spirit.

    Yay West Coast! (Canada... Cascadia)
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Wed, October 1, 2008 - 6:11 PM
      yeah, when I was in LA it was more common and easier to talk about. Here in Texas...well, I'm probably going to hell according to a lot of people. But one thing that annoyed me about Cali was the sun sign thing. I would always jump in with a "that's not all you have to look at!" because I think that is exactly what gives astrology a bad name- people always tend to use the whole "it's too general" reason to knock it, and some people read cosmo and talk about what shoes they should wear because they're a Libra - that really irks me. And when I try to explain more, people don't have the patience.

      That always shocks me- I mean, here we are with this amazing tool to understanding ourselves and others and the world...and people say things like, "I forgot what my moon is." that surprises me every time.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 2:09 AM
    I rarely open the subject up. I usually don't, but sometimes I can't help it, and when something related comes up, I'll say something like "you know, astrology would really clear that up for you".

    Whether they're open-minded or not depends a lot on their astro-charts, of course..lol.
    Sometimes I get into arguments, and my main pro-argument is that not everything we can't explain "logically" and scientifically is fake and/or inefficient. (electricity, for instance) I mean, a lot of things we use in our day-to-day lives haven't been really defined, or determined.


  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 6:12 AM
    It depends on who I'm with. I don't care if other people think it is rubbish but always ask them why they think so first. I like people who can defend their thoughts and beliefs, so if someone says I don't believe it because of X, Y and Z then I'm fine with that.
    I get more annoyed with people who say 'cos everyone knows its rubbish'.

    Most people don't really believe in it or disbelieve, but will happily take that being a leo means they're great performers and being a scorpio means they'e great in bed.
  • Tam
    Tam
    offline 1

    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 4:11 PM
    So glad this was posted because just this week I made the decision to stop talking about it with my friends...The one's that I find are most interested are the ones that have always been into self evaluation and want to become better people.

    I love that I found tribe, its like my dirty little secret. My boyfriend is the only one that knows about this and he lets me tell him about his chart whenever I want.

    Generally I find people are interested but just like with any subject, you cant take it too far or they will be turned off. Astrology has defintely helped me understand myself better, that's primarily why I started studying. But I like helping others also, the average person usually isn't aware how they come off to others.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 7:30 PM
    I find it irresistible to talk about Astrology when people around me go ga-ga over the newspaper/magazine postings of horoscope for your sun signs. It's simply misleading and it's hard to sit back and watch your friends actually digesting that silly information. Laughing about it with a good does of scepticism is not half as bad.

    A while back, I'd sent out easy to read astrological articles to friends who were vaguely interested and offered to tell them where the natal positions are according to their charts so they can connect it back to the article I'm posting, like the full moons, mercury retrograde, etc. I felt that by doing that, it shows them there's much more beyond sun signs if they're interested. But if not, then it may perhaps give them a indication that your weekly horoscope in the papers is a load of crap.

    Some friends came up to me and asked me to read their charts for them, but after a while many started asking for that too. As an astrology student, I thought it'd be more interesting if we learn it together. Unfortunately, that idea that we form a group to learn never got very far since they weren't interested beyond me telling them what stereotypes they should fit in ("oh this is so me!").

    Some friends simply want me to read their charts so they can use logic to shoot it down. Those people I avoid because I don't see the need to explain why I use astrology and why I have to defend myself against their scepticism.

    Acceptable? Sure! If you offer to read their charts and tell them about themselves all the time. Sure! If you're willing to put up with the "astrology is not science. It's nothing more than a hocus-pocus pseudo-mathematical activity, etc" When people are open, anything you say can be taken into consideration. when people are fixed, nothing you say will convince them otherwise.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Wed, October 1, 2008 - 7:43 PM
      Yeah. I basically do not talk about it much to folks around here, except to say things like, "Well, Mercury is in retrograde again, you know." That usually gets a wan smile.

      As far as people thinking astrology is a bunch of bosh, when I get the pseudo-science rap, I point out that it is NOT a psuedo-science, but a protoscience. That usually will prompt at least a question if not a nod. When you start discussing astrology in terms of history, people take a slightly different attitude. Then they think that you are interested in studying it for its historical value, which of course, seems to have more legitimacy. lol. I like to humor the darlings a bit. They listen a little better that way....
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Wed, October 1, 2008 - 8:04 PM
        "I get more annoyed with people who say 'cos everyone knows its rubbish'"

        When people go out of their way to dismiss it like that, I've been known to ask them how long they studied the subject before they felt qualified to judge it.
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Wed, October 1, 2008 - 8:10 PM
          I just had a thought that it is a lot like trying to engage someone in talking about quantum physics. While they may not say it is rubbish, they usually have not studied that either, and you get the same glazed look, and usually a quick subject change to something like the deal at Safeway on stuffed pork chops. Pork chops are important and easy to digest. Most people do not have much appetite for String Theory and astrology. Isn't it great to have such a nice restaurant here?
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Thu, October 2, 2008 - 12:52 AM
          "When people go out of their way to dismiss it like that, I've been known to ask them how long they studied the subject before they felt qualified to judge it."

          I've only done that a few times, cos I end up winding myself up and getting really annoyed when the just laugh. I try to just hold my tongue 'cos everyone is entitled to their opinion and all that, but I do find it hard. Holding my tongue was never strong point!
          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

            Thu, October 2, 2008 - 2:08 AM
            When confronted by skepticism or ridicule regarding astrology, one of my favorite one-liners (and one-liners can go a long way in these circumstances) is: "I don't believe in astrology either; I use it because it works." This usually creates a lovely silence and then a "thud thud thud" (sound of jaws hitting floor) from which a common reply is: "How can you not believe in something and use it?"

            At this point, I have been known to say something silly like, "I don't need to believe in science to know that it works." Now this kind of response tends to get under their skins a bit and if they're not fuming by now, they're laughing outloud. What I have learned from this playful approach is that words act just like drugs. And giving voice to certain words can trigger real neurochemical reactions in the brain causing all kinds of weird behaviorial reactions. And "astrology" just happens to be one of those words.
          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

            Thu, October 2, 2008 - 6:07 AM
            "I've been known to ask them how long they studied the subject before they felt qualified to judge it."

            Kinda reminds me of Isaac Newton's quote to (I think Halley) about (I think) Christianity.

            "Sir, I have studied the subject, you have not!"
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Sun, October 5, 2008 - 11:50 PM
      Well ironically enough some of us (especially the ladies) can attribute our early interest in astrology to newspaper and magazine horoscope mumbo-jumbo :-) Some of us take it further. Some of us don't :-)

      Sometimes i still do read the stuff to see if there's resonance; one of my guilty pleasures. The ones that make reference to planetary movements seem more legit of course.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 8:11 PM
    Since I'm not religious and wasn't raised that way.. it comes as an utter and inconvenient shock to people that I ahve an intrest in astrology. What can I say? I just don't cater to an audience..but it's not intentional..and not rebellious..it's just what I know to be true.

    focusing on solar signs depletes the interest of the astrology skeptic faster than anything else I find.

  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 8:14 PM
    The first person who introduced me to astrology was perhaps the m ost brilliant person I had met... as a teenager.

    He was (and hopefully stll is) an extraordianrily well-read and well-educated fellow...and I'm forever grateful for his introduction.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Wed, October 1, 2008 - 9:40 PM
    Ah let's see, I know few and far between people who accept Astrology for more than that horoscope bullshit that is written in the newspaper/magazines/etc; those I do know in person I see when I go to this in person Astrology meetup everything, other than that, I can't find those people.

    I do know some people who are acceptable of it but aren't exactly willing to learn more. Eh, online I have come across those who believe you cannot be a Christian and believe in Astrology- I said to fuck if I can't cause I believe in God and Astrology, so meh.

    I don't speak of Astrology with those in person unless I know for a fact that they are into it or accepting- otherwise, I will not mention it, possibly by accident if I do.

    It's hard to deal with Astrology "skeptics" yes, I do agree.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Wed, October 1, 2008 - 11:52 PM
      I find it dangerous to talk astrology with people that don't know astrology! They don't have the tools necessary to understand what I am saying so it is pointless. Some know of my interest in astrology and if they show interest as well, I am willing to engage in a conversation.
      Most of them offer lame lines like: "You can't believe stars rule our lives! Get serious!"...and i think to myself: "if only it was that simple!"
      I don't usually take the time to respond lines like that but I did once: the next day, I found out that the guy bought himself an astrology book - miracles do happen!
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Thu, October 2, 2008 - 3:03 AM
    Even mainstreem personal development books that aim to improve your character, emotional maturity and dicipline is seen as kooky these days. Astrology is a bit too out there for most people. I think we can blame the religous fundamentalist for that as everything non-scientific is kookey these days.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 3:11 AM
      I find the contradictions funny though. The same people that say no to anything slightly mythical see believers as wierd because they *just know* theres something going on that we don't fully understand. Because after all there is "no proof that religion and astrology are real. And the absence of proof makes them not believe in it. And just beause there is nothing that disproves astrology, doesn't mean that astrology is therefor real."

      The same people also happen to *just know* that there are ufo's and life on other planets. Even though there are no proof that ufo's exist and that the abcence of proof isn't enough to make them not believe in it.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Thu, October 2, 2008 - 3:18 AM
    We live in very cynical times. Science has become the new method for establishing "truth" and anything that doesn't make sense to the scientific method is seen as illusion and superstition. I'm always leery of people with too much of a scientific bent. They tend to come off as soul-less.

    Peace, Bo
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 3:59 AM
      "We live in very cynical times. Science has become the new method for establishing "truth" and anything that doesn't make sense to the scientific method is seen as illusion and superstition. I'm always leery of people with too much of a scientific bent. They tend to come off as soul-less. "

      Yup, I blame the Richard Dawkins people of the world with attitudes basically saying if it can't be found under a microscope it isn't real. The God Delusion and all that. I find it interesting then that these same scientists use, in their equations, a theoretical elementary particle called 'Higgs boson' or 'the god particle', of which there is aboslutely no evidence for. They use it because without it, their theory of the universe etc. would fall apart. They use it cos it works. Here in Europe, CERN's Large Hadron Collider has been receieving a lot of media attention recently. Oone of the things they're looking for is this 'god particle'. The fact that these people on one hand base entire mathematical calculations on theoretical particles they can't explain and then scoff others for using other theories that science can't explain strikes me as a little hypocritical. It saddens me that most everyday people are torn between religious zealots who say their beliefs allow them to blow up planes and kill people and then the scientists who say nothing is real unless we can prove it to be.

      If this isn't the dawning of the age of aquarius I don't know what is. Aquarius has got to be the most 'faith'-less and scientific of the signs. People normally think that age of aquarius means flower power and that everything will be ok, but aquarius isn't liek that, just that stupid song is.
      We live in a world where databases have more power than people. We're just a number now, we live in big brother and anything big brother deems socially unacceptable, becomes so.
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Thu, October 2, 2008 - 5:35 AM
        Yeah, but then you get a guy like Niels Bohr who told Wolgang Pauli:

        "We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough."

        My kind of physicist.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Thu, October 2, 2008 - 3:24 AM
    I always start slow, with banter about sun signs... when people are receptive, then I start going deeper.

    When I see skeptical red flags I back off. I usually tell the very persistent ones that people are afraid of what they do not understand so unless they were asking questions about what astrology is rather than condemning it even before I could answer, then I would not push ahead with the conversation.

    I have hardly had adversarial conversations on astrology and most times I keep mum not really to keep the peace, but it's hard to have a great blissed out conversation about astrology and planetary placements if your audience are limited to sunsigns only.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Thu, October 2, 2008 - 6:05 AM
    To be fortunate enough to know someone intimately and able to explore beyond the mundane everyday world together is a great privilege, at least to me...The direct flow of trust and familiarity can create a bond that inspires this intimate connection to grow deeper and wider and at the same time gets nourished and nurtured by it. I guess it takes a certain kind of person to be open to that which connects all, someone transsaturnal I guess, preferrably Uranian. ;)

    Astrology seems the most inclusive and universal language provided to humanity to make sense of the 'impermance' holding it's sway over us - what may seem natural to us, might seem daunting and folly to others - I guess they seem content to remain in their small shell of ignorance...occupied with other themes in this embodiement.

    As for work of the devil, hahaha...well I would say: read your Bible, it was written by those apt and formed by traditions going back aeons of astrological observation. Still...there are sheep and goat. So, we might seem like outsiders, but we're really not...just got the shamanic tinge...
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 6:10 AM
      "As for work of the devil, hahaha...well I would say: read your Bible"

      I totally agree, I mean in the first chapters of the New Testament is said that Three Magi found Christ by following the rising of his star.

      Must have been devil worshipper then.
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Thu, October 2, 2008 - 8:41 AM
        Jesus consciously uses astrological and kabbalistic allegories, check out the Mazdayasna and Cabbalah tribes. But that is not all: hundreds of churches all over the world use zodiacal imagery. Jesus coming has been prophesized by his predecessors in astrological terms. It's ironic that the people driving in cars with a fish sticker on the bumper try to paganize it so vehemently, where they themselves should search their souls, as they follow the wrong fish . But they can't help it, probably some Pluto -Jupiter squares inconjunct their moon. Anyway, that time is over, where one fish swims this way and the other...we are rapidly moving into the Aquarian age where the currents will be in synergy...

        They are all the same - the divisionists and those who want to confuse others with fear and scepticism. The project their own hidden thoughts and guilt complexes onto others. Jesus didn't use this symbolism just in a speculative way, he wanted to wake people up to the archetypical energies and hierarchies represented by the many wheels above and below such as in the Pistis Sophia. There are allways two paths: that of Devotion and that of Knowledge, they come together in Sophia.

        All the nations long for the same truth...and truth is the same for all nations. It doesn't matter which creed or practise you follow, as long as you Love All and fear not. Astrological knowledge is the supreme path to Gnosis, many here think it it just a way to figure out your own personalities and those of others to create an illusion of control over your projected fear and desire complexes.

        Think of it though...In India they have described one hundred part of A (sabian) degree...each little degree holds whole galaxies in it's eyes looking back at us...influenced by us...everything recorded going back whole Aeons until now, the amount of knowledge inherent in a birth chart is infinite.

        But the divine art of Astrology goes much farther than that, it holds the keys to liberation, yet it is not enough to just intellectualize and speculate, true astrology comes forth where the micro-cosm consciously transforms itself from the fetters of karma symbolized by the energy flows of the charts and wholeheartedly embraces the freedom of Dharmic expression hidden superimposed in the birth chart.

        This has been the adept practise for Aeons in the esoterical traditions of Christianity, Alchemy, Cabbalah, Sufism, Mazdayasna, Kemet and both exoterically and esoterically by the many traditions inherent in Buddhism and Santana Dharma. The 'churches' (which in no way reflect the true Ecclesia) have been taken over by the miserly and opportunists, so has science...not yet the ever-persecuted Third Stream of Gnosticism, the real heritage of Western Spirituality, but it is all the same...There is still so much to learn from other times and cultures, such as Kemet, the Aztecs, the Chinese, etc....

        We should forego this spirit of isolation and bickering that prevails among the ignorant in the 'real world' and at least on tribe celebrate an atmosphere of tolerance and openess, not just for eachothers personal stories but also for the more outlandish and metaphysical streams of consciousness, many a pearl washes a shore that way...
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:47 PM
      Partha says - To be fortunate enough to know someone intimately and able to explore beyond the mundane everyday world together is a great privilege, at least to me...The direct flow of trust and familiarity can create a bond that inspires this intimate connection to grow deeper and wider and at the same time gets nourished and nurtured by it. I guess it takes a certain kind of person to be open to that which connects all, someone transsaturnal I guess, preferrably Uranian. ;)

      Ah, sounds like love of the first order!
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:50 PM
        This kind of love -- well, in MHO, Uranian energy has that with all (albiet seemingly soul-less). Piscean energy has it with all (and loses self in the process). I like that we're in the age of Aquarius.
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Sat, October 4, 2008 - 7:58 AM
          inho, Uranian energy is *not* soul-less. ( not even seemingly)

          Why many people think pure emotional energy (neptunian, lunar, venusian) is always or even mostly soul-ful, I'm not quite certain.

          Sometimes an emotion-soaked way of meeting the world is an exhibition of pure egoism..selfish, not selfless.

          I think the allegation that Aquarians are soooo detached is a stereotype that is over-emphasized to the exclusion of all the positive aspects of Uranian (aquarian), or even mercurial influences. (I might be a bit.. biased though ; )

          We all have all of the planetary and sign influences in our charts...somewhere...imo it's better to integrate those influences than to separate and deny them.
          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

            Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:00 PM
            No one is saying that. It's about being balanced. It's great to be inquisitive, scientific, detached...but one must also have an emotional quotient. Otherwise we're just reasoning monkeys.
            By the way, I'm a double Aquarian (sun and ascendant, as well as Mercury and north node). I've been called reserved occasionally...but never cold.

            Peace, Bo
            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

              Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:56 PM
              <This kind of love -- well, in MHO, Uranian energy has that with all (albiet seemingly soul-less). Piscean energy has it with all (and loses self in the process). I like that we're in the age of Aquarius.>

              Bodhi: "No one is saying that."

              yes many people *are* often alleging that Aquarius-prominent and urnainan prominent personalities are uber-detached and in this instance "seemingly soul-less".

              I think this is more than a tas simplistic, is all I was saying. Actually I was saying a few other things too but I already said them.

              otoh I never said that emotion was a bad thing..lol! it's a balance...and integrated balance that desrves more consideration ( more goal than reality, I fear)
              • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                Sat, October 4, 2008 - 8:04 PM
                "yes many people *are* often alleging that Aquarius-prominent and urnainan prominent personalities are uber-detached and in this instance "seemingly soul-less".

                Skylar,

                You miss my point. Did I not say I'm glad we're in the Age of Aquarius? I happen to agree that any transaturnian position is 'with all.' I'm simply saying that I'm glad we're doing it without loss of self (yes, I believe 12th house folks (including myself) do this.) Those of us who are already strongly neptunian would be getting a double whammy if we were, say, in the age of pisces.
                • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                  Sun, October 5, 2008 - 7:58 PM
                  Varoom, thanks for the comment on my comment.

                  I don't know if this is the Age of Aquarius or not. I have mostly studied natal, progressed and transit-oriented astrology.

                  < happen to agree that any transaturnian position is 'with all.'>

                  What do you mean by "'with all' "?

                  (will now look into the subtelety of the word "albeit"..got some Gemini going on in my chart too; )
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Thu, October 2, 2008 - 11:30 AM
    I don't see why society matters anyways. I mean, other than from the economical perspective.

    It's so obvious that the need we humans feel for social acceptance comes from the animal side, not the spiritual side. It it only logical that the only defense mechanisms we have as a species are our minds-the ability to create an environment that suits us, and sticking together-unity.

    So, imagine what it would be like for our species if every, say, 500 people defined their own ethical/religious system to live by and were completely devoted to protecting them. I mean, we'd be killing each other like...dunno...elephant seals...

    Well, bottom-line, it was never really a question for me. One thing I do wonder about, though, is the possibility that studying astrology might prevent the individual from reaching his/her potential.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 11:46 AM
      It's so obvious that the need we humans feel for social acceptance comes from the animal side, not the spiritual side.
      ~~~~~~~~
      that's not obvious to me ~ I think the 'collective' is VERY spiritual

      love all-ways,
      mem
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Thu, October 2, 2008 - 12:05 PM
        "the collective"-never. Well, at least not the way my Neptunian self sees it.

        Spirituality is between the individual and God, the way I see it. Then, again, my Pisces Sun IS in the 7th, "house of partnerships".

        And, of course, it also depends on what you mean by "the collective". If you resume yourself to witnessing the divine in God's work, then it's cool.

        But letting yourself being dragged into human social plays is not the way to find the divine. Humans are all doomed to make mistakes, and just because some people feel passionate and sure of themselves in pursuing this or that ideal, or supporting this or that belief doesn't mean they're right. (like me, yes..LOL)
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 12:31 PM
      the animal side, the spiritual side...same thing...expressions of the same spirit. any imposed schism between 'animal' and 'spiritual', and the value judgments assigning a priori status to one over the other, only fuels the emotional plague of tormented souls
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Thu, October 2, 2008 - 1:19 PM
        "the animal side, the spiritual side...same thing...expressions of the same spirit."

        These are two different things.

        To say "same thing" - Is different than saying "expressions of the same spirit"

        The body is the "expressions of the same spirit" - as is everything else.

        But the animal side and spiritual side are not "the same thing".

        The needs of the body are different than the needs of the soul.

        The body holds the Souls needs, but not Vice versa.

        The body is finite and limited. The soul is eternal.

        The body must be honored as the agency of direct experiential wisdom in the moment - as expressing the souls wisdom. But thinking the body (limited Self) to be the soul or the ultimate nature of Self is the source of all human suffering.

        This is what happens when Eastern mysticism interacts with the Western mind.

        methinks.
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Thu, October 2, 2008 - 7:23 PM
      "One thing I do wonder about, though, is the possibility that studying astrology might prevent the individual from reaching his/her potential. "

      Agreed, Mantis.
      Key word "might"

      The more we focus on becoming the symbols, behaving like what we imagine them to describe, the more trapped in the image, and less genuine we become.
      I laugh every time I hear someone justifying their actions based on their sun sign. I know I've fallen victim to it myself.

      If we recognize that Astrology exists as one descriptor among many, and use it to embrace the best and the worst of ourselves, then hey, beautiful tool. Else, I find the language sometimes unbearably pretentious.

      I think E-Prime can provide a valuable escape route.
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Thu, October 2, 2008 - 7:43 PM
        I look at it as a metaphoric system, which involves a kind of thinking that is often disregarded in the post-modern world. Astrology has an organizing principle that is capable of utilizing a variety of other metaphoric systems to illuminate itself. Some of us are oriented to thinking in this manner, so, of course, we would be interested in it, particlarly when it seems to shed light on certain issues of consciousness and how they relate to understanding ourselves.

        The symbols in astrology are archetypes, which by their nature have a sort of numinous grandiosity. Archetypes tend to dazzle until they are absorbed and understood.
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:20 AM
          usually, I get some response like this, "I don't believe in that stuff."

          I've even had a jackass astronomy professor that has tried to convince me that astrology is a load of bull. He's been studying astronomy for atleast 30 some years. One would think after so long, they would see some sort of pattern or corrolation. Either he is too stupid to see it, or he was trying to keep the class dumb.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:15 AM
        ps.

        singhilarity,

        I know what u mean, but I had already manifested negative Pisces traits for 15 years(all my life at that time) when I found astrology and realized it was in my "nature".(well, according to this so-called pseudo-science, cause I always knew nothing was engraved in stone)
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:23 AM
          I get this sick feeling in my stomach and automatically dislike the person a little bit if they deny astrology without even researching it for themselves. It's like they just accept what the majority thinks and are too afraid to stand alone in their beliefs, spineless cowards!
          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

            Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:53 AM
            "and automatically dislike the person a little bit if they deny astrology"

            Isn't that a little harsh? Surely they're entitled to not belive in it (even with no research, no study and no reasons). It can be annoying, sure, but should you dislike someone for their stance on it?
            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

              Fri, October 3, 2008 - 4:48 AM
              Well, in a certain way it can reveal a basic tendency of their personalities...such as hard aspects to mercury from Saturn or something... People are here for different reasons. You might want to observe the energy with which they put down astrology, some are just afraid, others are at war with anything intuitive, you might not want to associate with the latter.
            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

              Fri, October 3, 2008 - 7:17 AM
              I guess one can view it as a little harsh. They are entilted to believe or not believe what they wish, but it's a bit hard for me to like that person... Inwardly I'm calling them stupid for not wanting to dig deeper for the wisdom(astrology or something else). =p I guess maybe I'm just a bastard. haha

              OK, ok...I see your point Paul and I do agree with you sir. We're all different and surely we think differently also. I should not judge people by my standards of "intelligence." However, the main reason this annoys me is because the less people think(specifically, critical analysis), the more likely they are susceptible of being controlled by the others(who don't give a rat's ass about their welfare). I try to enlighten them, but many push me away and sometimes even insult me! This really tries my patience! I want to spread some light but it feels like they only want to stay in the dark. I remember seeing a movie about some college students that tried to free cows from a slaughtering house only to realize when they opened the gates none of the cows wanted to leave.
              • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                Fri, October 3, 2008 - 12:50 PM
                23 (Is that the name you're using, or did the Age of Aquarius catch up on you too quick?),

                "Inwardly I'm calling them stupid for not wanting to dig deeper for the wisdom(astrology or something else). =p I guess maybe I'm just a bastard. haha "

                Do you think that the people you are saying that to are thinking the very same thing about you? They may look at you as being stupid for believing in something that cannot be proven, they may believe that at least what they believe in can be proven to be true, whereas you're going on (in their eyes) blind faith. They may very well use the (really brilliant) analogy of the cows in the slaughterhouse and apply that analogy to you.

                "This really tries my patience! I want to spread some light but it feels like they only want to stay in the dark."

                You are asking them to be tolerant of your beliefs, as if they were, they may grow wiser and more tolerant themselves. Being tolerant means allowing others to believe or not believe in what they choose to. They may choose something out of ignorance, fear or hard study or blind faith. If we're tolerant, it won't matter to us. Being tolerant means being tolerant of others who aren't.
                • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                  Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:02 PM
                  Paul,

                  Very well said.

                  I find that most astrology skeptics make much better points than astrologers and astrology students.

                  The reason people are skeptical of astrology is because most astrologers and students cannot exp[lain what it is and ask people to believe it anyway.

                  FYI - Astrology can be "proven" on the same terms as Western "believable" Sciences very easily, but first it has to be understood that way.

                  In general, it is not.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:08 PM
                    There are also some people who, despite a cogent reason, will reject a system of thought anyway. To me, that only means that there is a topic that there is no point in discussing with a particular person or ~ there is no point talking at length any more at the moment.

                    By, the way, nice dances you had with mem. <smile>
                    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                      Fri, October 3, 2008 - 8:06 PM
                      "There are also some people who, despite a cogent reason, will reject a system of thought anyway. "

                      Very true.

                      For them, just say your peace and move on.

                      But there are many more who are interested in it and open - but then so many astrologers and "astrology believers" sound like freaking Kooks - cannot explain it (because they do not understand it themselves) and it is a big turn off.
                      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                        Fri, October 3, 2008 - 8:12 PM
                        I totally agree. But, you know, there comes a point when you just blow it all off anyway. Like I like brussel sprouts with soy sauce. I am perfectly aware that many people do not like brussel sprouts with soy sauce. So I don't talk about brussel sprouts and soy sauce with them. But some people like brussel sprouts with soy sauce, and when I meet them, we usually go off and talk about other foods as well. It is just a matter of finding the right folks, don't you think?
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 8:42 PM
                    "The reason people are skeptical of astrology is because most astrologers and students cannot exp[lain what it is and ask people to believe it anyway. "

                    Or they say 'nice pictures, show me what you really have..."

                • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                  Fri, October 3, 2008 - 9:17 PM
                  "23 (Is that the name you're using, or did the Age of Aquarius catch up on you too quick?), "

                  There is no need to be rhetorically offensive. Aren't you trying to enlighten me on a more humanitarian approach? Shouldn't you be tolerant of my beliefs and preferences, the name of my avatar in this case. If you're trying to convince me of tolerant, shouldn't you be a good example of it? =p

                • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                  Fri, October 3, 2008 - 9:29 PM
                  "Do you think that the people you are saying that to are thinking the very same thing about you? They may look at you as being stupid for believing in something that cannot be proven, they may believe that at least what they believe in can be proven to be true, whereas you're going on (in their eyes) blind faith. They may very well use the (really brilliant) analogy of the cows in the slaughterhouse and apply that analogy to you. "

                  Astrology is extremely difficult to prove and thus has not been proven yet, but that does not mean it cannot be proven.
                  The analogy of the cows applies to the majority. Followers of astrology are part of the minority so the analogy does not apply in reverse.

                  You are asking them to be tolerant of your beliefs, as if they were, they may grow wiser and more tolerant themselves. Being tolerant means allowing others to believe or not believe in what they choose to. They may choose something out of ignorance, fear or hard study or blind faith. If we're tolerant, it won't matter to us. Being tolerant means being tolerant of others who aren't.

                  Tolerance is not always the best way anyways! Should I teach a man how to fish or be tolerant of his belief that fishing is evil and let him starve? From your method, tolerance will lead the man in this case to starve to death. Fine, leave the cows in the slaughtering house, at least I've been a good and tolerant person. =p
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 9:32 PM
                    It's really not about faith to me. Astrology has taught me so much about myself, others and the universe. I see so many people confused and give into the belief systems of others. It does not seem right to me.
                    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                      Sat, October 4, 2008 - 2:53 AM
                      "I see so many people confused and give into the belief systems of others. It does not seem right to me."

                      Can you explain what you mean?

                      Sounds like you're saying that other people get confused and just give into the pressures of other beliefs systems but your own, which does not seem right to you? Don't want to jump to conclusions, but is that what you're saying? Just want to clarify, cos you could read it a couple of different ways.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                    Sat, October 4, 2008 - 2:48 AM
                    23

                    I hadn't meant to offend you. I just posted on how we're becoming more Age of Aquarius, alluding to the face that we're just becoming a number to the governments etc. Then you post on as a number, too good an oppurtunity to pass up! Should have added an emoticon ;p

                    I think your cows analogy can apply to anyone that refuses to move or be helped. In some ways it demonstrates the negative side of the Fixed signs. In any event it can apply just as much to the astrologers who refuse to listen to scientific reason, and to the scientists who refuse to open their minds to other alternatives.

                    "Should I teach a man how to fish or be tolerant of his belief that fishing is evil and let him starve?"

                    I understand what you mean, but I do believe that you should let them choose their own path. What would you do instead in this example? Force him to eat fish? Hold him down and force feed him?
                    Having free-will surely means you can eat or not eat what you want. If we were all to feel that because I feel something is right I can enforce it upon someone else, we'd be living in a dictatorship (imagine that we're not already). Taken to an extreme you could say that if you believe we need red meat for a healthy body, you would forece vegans to eat red meat. YOu could keep going down that route, that because you believe one thing is better, you force others to comply, at which point you might say that (for example) red hair is negative to the gene pool and during pregnancy genetically alter the DNA of anyone who would have had red-hair.

                    We're all have God-given free will to think and do as we please, as long as it doesn't interfere with other people's free will. If that is so, then anyone can believe what they choose to, regardless if it is spiritually enlightening to them or not. We all can think what we want to, after all who is to say that we are right?



                    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                      Sat, October 4, 2008 - 4:36 AM
                      >We're all have God-given free will to think and do as we please, as long as it doesn't interfere with other people's free will. If that is so, then anyone can believe what they choose to, regardless if it is spiritually enlightening to them or not. We all can think what we want to, after all who is to say that we are right?<

                      I agree with you completely, everyone evolves in his own pace and sparkles up the sky from his or her most singular place.. But there is within each and everyone one of us A fundamental insecurity:

                      You can call it your Sun-Moon complex or whatever. But everyone of us tries to make other people think like them, as we are caught up in the great Lie - that everything is isolated and does not interact on deeper, subtler levels - thus philosophy, religion and war. We are insatiable for validation from the moment we are thrust into this world - whether we study Astrology or not.

                      As for "as long as it doesn't interfere with other people's free will" - this is nice, but think of it what happens everyday under the guises of the moon: all this confusion, fear, hate is stored and redistributed to us to try to burn away again and again. Even if someone eats meat and you don't - it's bound to affect you in some way, as the collective will allways do so, until you rip away the shrouds of the moon consciousness and initiate yourself step by step throught the Transsaturnals.

                      Unconditional acceptance of other peoples ways of life and looking onto the world is something that has to be fought for, which each fiber of our being - to be Autonomous, Self-Aware and yet connected to All that is. I can't think of a better place to begin than your own birth chart.

                      Let's be grateful for the fact we come so far and trusting what it will show us.. yet.
                      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                        Sat, October 4, 2008 - 4:54 AM
                        'Even if someone eats meat and you don't - it's bound to affect you in some way, as the collective will allways do so'

                        exactly, it may even be important to the collective that this person eats red meat (to continue our weak example) and that you do not. It may be important to the collective that there is a sceptic and that there is a believer. If we all thought the same way we'd be like the Borg, one collective thought. An interesting notion, but lacking in creativity and working under the assumption that that one thought is the correct one, which could be a fatally flawed stance to take. Far more important is it to be 'to be Autonomous, Self-Aware and yet connected to All that is. I can't think of a better place to begin than your own birth chart.' and nor can I.
                        Let's be careful we don't project the objects of the oppositions in our chart, whether they be planetary or our houses. Let's not project our own insecurities as to our intelligence onto others who do not think like us. For as you say 'there is within each and everyone one of us A fundamental insecurity'.
                        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                          Sat, October 4, 2008 - 5:05 AM
                          It is handy to be a hermit and to mousenest frequently. I believe in keeping in touch with the collective, but I like to go away when I feel like it.

                          Another good way of tolerating/enjoying/getting along with other people is to ignore, say, that they think astrology is bosh. I usually can find other points of connection besides that. Same thing with politics. I think it is like knowing boundaries. I surely have created many of my own and don't want others riding roughshod over them, so I extend the same right to others. I think that many human interactions often begin with agreeing to disagree, but then, I kind of liked Hobbes.
                          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                            Sat, October 4, 2008 - 5:21 AM
                            'I think that many human interactions often begin with agreeing to disagree,'

                            ok that one sentance just summed up what I was trying and failing and say.

                            (damned leos! think they're so great ;p)

                            Actually that brings me to another point. How socio-astrologically acceptable are the zodiac signs?

                            One thing I've noticed is that when you tell people (who know about astrology) that you're a Gemini (and even those who don't know anything about astrology) they sort of back up a bit and laugh saying 'oh ok, the two-faced one, better not tell you any secrets or you'll tell the world'.
                            I remember I was explaining to my cousin and her friends (who are 16-17) about their zodiac signs (really simple sun-sign stuff), I remember saying that Virgo can sometimes get a bit of a hard time in sun sign books as being a bit boring compared to say Leo. I was later told that the Virgo girl had been slagged off as being born a total bore, which obviously isn't what I meant at all!!

                            As astrologers do we pigeon-hole people by their sun-sign? I've heard so many astrologers (jokingly) say things like 'of course then he had to have a drink, hes a Pisces of course' or something similar. Perhaps the fault with people not finding astrology socially acceptable is due to the pigeon-holing that some astrologers give people. Astrology is a tool for self-improvement but can just as easily be used as a tool for persecution. You're a Leo so you're a show-off, you're an Aries so you're selfish, you're a Libra so you just a 'yes' man, you're a Taurus so you're a glutton, Capricorns are misers, Gemini are liars, Cancers are mammy's boys, Virgos are a bore, Scorpio are axe-murdering prostitues, Sagittarius are over-opinionated jokers, Aquarius are insane and Pisces are drug addicts etc.

                            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                              Sat, October 4, 2008 - 8:19 PM
                              "You're a Leo so you're a show-off, you're an Aries so you're selfish, you're a Libra so you just a 'yes' man, you're a Taurus so you're a glutton, Capricorns are misers, Gemini are liars, Cancers are mammy's boys, Virgos are a bore, Scorpio are axe-murdering prostitues, Sagittarius are over-opinionated jokers, Aquarius are insane and Pisces are drug addicts etc."

                              LOLOL Paul, and I agree...Actually, there's a lot of our sun sign in our nature, has to be, it's the sun afterall.

                              But why do I insist on the whole chart? 'Cuz that's what makes our special knowledge so special. We can actually tell the so-called Aries he's selfish in this way and not in the other. Or the Gemini, she's knowledgable in this way but not the other. OK, simplistic but you get my point. What draws people with this interest of ours (astrology) has to do with our 'other-worldly' experience as shown by our 'trans-saturnian' planets in connection to the personal ones -- or we wouldn't be here, collectively.
                        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                          Sat, October 4, 2008 - 5:25 AM
                          Yes, i agree. But just out of curiosity, where does that leave free will or 'dharma', in your opinion are we just playthings of the Gods or the Collective? Are there layers within this 'collective' at odds with eachother? What is it that is so set upon destroying itself in this Universe?

                          Where lies the balance between tolerance and doing the right thing? Do you know the Bhagavadgita? This seems exactly the dilemma Arjuna was grappling with, as he made ready to fight for what he thought was right, yet had to destroy half the world... Maybe it's more of an emotional thing...even if someone is ridiculing us for our predisposition for Astrology, aren't all are insights worthless if we think less of them for doing so?

                          We all do it, and we have to be careful, but isn't that the paradox, that we are supposed to project and seek validation and if we stop and are content, won't we enter another layer of this hierarchy we call being?

                          Bhagadvadgita Chapter 5 - verse 7:

                          "Performing prescribed action in the science of uniting the individual consciousnness with Ultimate Consciousness; those of purified intelligence; those of controlled mind and those who have conquered the senses are not affected by actions although engaged in actions; by self-realization of the soul within all souls of every living being."
                          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                            Sat, October 4, 2008 - 5:36 AM
                            Partha

                            I do not believe we are just the playthings of the gods. That is why I'm we're NOT like the Borg, merely different instances of the same thought.
                            There is a buffer between the collective and the personal. This is where our Dharma comes in.

                            I know OF the Bhagavad Gita but I do not know it. I have heard of it and know it relates in someway to eastern thought and to yoga. That is all I know of it.
                          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                            Sat, October 4, 2008 - 5:36 AM
                            "...those who have conquered the senses are not affected by actions although engaged in actions; by self-realization of the soul within all souls of every living being."

                            How can one feel "toyed with" with this is the brass ring? We tend to get caught up in looking at ethics as a thing in its own right when, in actuality, it does not exist outside our actions.
                            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                              Sat, October 4, 2008 - 6:03 AM
                              I agree completely. I guess it's the Sun-consciousness that feels toyed with.
                              • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                Sat, October 4, 2008 - 6:10 AM
                                Well, not mine. But then I am about as tempered as can be.
                                • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                  Sat, October 4, 2008 - 6:17 AM
                                  and certainly, no leo sun ever feels toyed with
                                  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                    Sat, October 4, 2008 - 6:57 AM
                                    'and certainly, no leo sun ever feels toyed with'

                                    Actually I think the Leos in my life are the ones who feel that way but actually can be very easily manipulated. They shine bright, Leo, but they cast a big shadow too! Their pride is the key to manipulating them. I don't manipulate people myself whenever I can help it (at least not conciously) but I have seen Leos take pay cuts and take on more work, do things they don't want to really do and so on just because the person asking them to complimented them and made it out that in doing what they wanted.
                                    I know one Leo who took on twice as much responsibility at work for LESS money than they were on because they were told "listen, we need to cut pay across the board, because the credit-crunch is hitting us, but noone else here is as talented as you are when it comes to this, so we need you to take on more responsibility. You'll be in charge'.
                                    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                      Sat, October 4, 2008 - 6:59 AM
                                      Having said all that, Leo is still my fave sign of the zodiac. I've more Leo friends than any others!

                                      Its my MC also, which might explain why! I think they're the easiest sign to recognise as well, especially if its Rising. Big hair, big smile, perfect teeth and big heart!
                                    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                      Sat, October 4, 2008 - 11:38 AM
                                      "Leos in my life are the ones who feel that way but actually can be very easily manipulated."

                                      shhhhh! you want to keep your leo friends!
                                      but seriously, i was thinking of Gods as something other than friends and associates.
                                      and we shouldn't confuse their generosity with our abilities to manipulate them.
                                      And if you get caught trying, they might nott hesitate to burn that friendship up like a paper match.
                                      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                        Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:08 PM
                                        Right. We only want to be manipulated when we don't know about it. Errr...that doesn't sound right....
                                        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                          Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:35 PM
                                          <<Right. We only want to be manipulated when we don't know about it. Errr...that doesn't sound right....>>

                                          Could this dillemna reflect the subconscious truth of being "manipulated" by our own unconscious motivations, desires and fears every day ? We all like to feel as if we are in control; that is human enough. However, we may not be in control of very much at all. Why else would we insist on fantasies such as astrology to justify and define so many aspects of our existence ?

                                          By the way, I use the term "fantasy" here broadly to embrace the idea that our interpretations may be gambles at best, ie., not to be confused for gospels carved in stone that so cheerfully maintain the illusion of our, um, certitudes.
                                          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                            Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:42 PM
                                            I thought you did not believe in the unconscious, but never mind.

                                            Our mental constructs are all fantasies of one kind or another. Some ground themselves in what I would call "the best known reality"; others sort of drift off into other places. I think the best fantasies are the ones that allow you to get along while still being able to do what you want, such as mousenesting.
                                            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                              Sat, October 4, 2008 - 1:56 PM
                                              Oh. I think by now you know how fond I am of the concept of the unconscious. I actually think that there is something connected with the subatomic there, but whatever.

                                              In any case, when a system clearly operates with the collective unconscious, I take notice. But I am such a Jungophile.
                                          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                            Sun, October 5, 2008 - 10:33 PM
                                            Control is an illusion.

                                            This is why I feel that every human being must believe in something greater than himself; a faith or a system of beliefs where there are larger and sometimes unknown forces at work shaping and moulding our fates than within our limited reach. Some people believe in astrology, some believe in God, guardian angels; it does not matter as long as we realise our fragility, the transience of our presence on this planet.

                                            If human beings believe that they are the on the top of the food chain/ the centre of the universe, one or both of these things can happen:

                                            Pride that leads to a fall. Manipulating the environment and other people as a means to our ends which against the flow of the universe insisting that we know best, tends to blow up in our faces in ways that will only be more and more debilitating if the lessons are not heeded while the warnings are not so urgent.Global warming and family, friends and even acquaintances that we may identify as toxic energy vampires are just two examples.

                                            The reduction of lifeform to the purely Darwinistic; evolutionary. If life is without purpose except for survival of the fittest, then what use are our feelings such as happiness, sadness, love and empathy and insecurity and hate and disconnectedness? It does not make any sense that these should be considered mere 'accessories' to our existence because a great proportion of our actions are based on such feelings; how we are driven to insanity when a loved one is maimed by disease or leaves for another lover. How one's hate can drive him to murder. How one's empathy can save a life. Feelings are the closest links that we have to our spiritual consciousness.

                                            Denying your feelings and not attempting to understand or accept them will only lead to a disconnect with our spiritual consciousness; especially in a world where intellectualisation is valued over all other kinds of intelligence. The result? Supremely intelligent chronic thinkers who are usually disconnected, empty and unhappy.

                                            Over intellectualisation may be a symptom of denying one's feelings, or not feeling enough, or feeling too much and not knowing what to do with it.
                                            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                              Sun, October 5, 2008 - 11:08 PM
                                              <The reduction of lifeform to the purely Darwinistic; evolutionary. If life is without purpose except for survival of the fittest, then what use are our feelings such as happiness, sadness, love and empathy and insecurity and hate and disconnectedness? It does not make any sense that these should be considered mere 'accessories' to our existence because a great proportion of our actions are based on such feelings; how we are driven to insanity when a loved one is maimed by disease or leaves for another lover. How one's hate can drive him to murder. How one's empathy can save a life. Feelings are the closest links that we have to our spiritual consciousness. >

                                              I am quite fond of Darwin, even though Natural Selection is not teleological. By the way, Darwin never used the phrase "survivial of the fittest" ~ that was a phase coined by Herbert Spencer in his Principles of Biology of 1864. He was the original Social Darwinist.

                                              Darwin actually covered the evolution of emotions and such in his work "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex".

                                              I honestly don't know if every human being must believe in something greater than himself, but I sure wouldn't want to believe in that for the purpose of merely humbling myself, which I can do quite nicely without getting very far into spirituality. I think I come from the "Wonder" school of spirituality, where even Darwin is wonderful.
                                              • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                                Mon, October 6, 2008 - 12:02 AM
                                                I learnt something new today.

                                                Pardon me I am such a dilettante thanks to my lazy Libran disposition. I think nuggets of information have to fulfill two roles; have immediate bearing on what I am interested in or working on, or provide fodder for banter such as this. I am less likely to be accurate when it comes to the latter because nuggets of information then becomes trivia to toss around at parties and for discussions that not necessarily provide an immediate solution to whatever the quandary may be but just another point to print and file into our brain cells. In this case, we are discussing the quandary of existence.

                                                I don't believe in believing in something greater than yourself for the sake of humbling yourself, but understanding that you are just a cogwheel in a greater mechanism, of which you are not the centre of. Life becomes a lot easier to digest when you don't take ALL the credit or blame for everything that happens to you.

                                                Well at least there is "wonder" in your school of spirituality. Unfortunately I find a dearth of wonder among those close to me who like Darwin and are coincidentally but not surprisingly atheists for that matter.
                                            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

                                              Tue, October 7, 2008 - 7:16 PM
                                              How can you not love a lady?

                                              "If life is without purpose except for survival of the fittest, then what use are our feelings such as happiness, sadness, love and empathy and insecurity and hate and disconnectedness? "
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 5:06 AM
    I agree that too much intellectual self enquiry can cause a person to overlook
    the obvious and just take action, i've been there... Astrology cannot enlighten us,
    only practises corresponding to an innate talent or adeptness, revealed in the chart can -
    though often a progressions and transits make it happen despite of our conscious wish
    to engage in it. Nothing is written...Yes, an important factor in this is perhaps Neptune's influence...
    capable of feeling across the divides and perceiving that which unifies us.

    Since i've been researching minor aspects, these intermediary subtle states (bridges) between the more
    obvious major ones have revealed a lot of opportunities for inner growth and ways to accomplish them.
    In a way, you could say, each single point in the Zodiac is connected to eachother point...there are no
    unaspected planets, no wide orbs, there is allways a sphere of influence or interaction. They are just
    more etheric and elusive...

    This is a great book which describes this process of linking aspect orbal realms with Dane Rudhyar's
    Sabian evoltionary progression through the Zodiac, connecting your left brain hemisphere to your right:
    producing a symbolical image of each and every aspect angle possible:

    www.amazon.com/Sabian-Asp.../ref=sr_1_4

    Look for instance to aspects of the Ascendant and it's ruler and the
    sign housing the ruler. Look for the minor aspects formed by the
    ascendant and the transsaturnals. Look for major planets
    (natal, midpoint, asteroids, synastry, composite, transit, progression)
    occupying critical aspects formed by septile series (dividing your chart in
    sevens from your Ascendant) to further this integration of
    personality and soul. Look for the meaning of the Sabian degrees of
    your Ascendant, Ruler and Sun. There are so many ways to finds a
    starting point of the real journey from map to the landscape of your
    inner being.

    www.universalastrologer.com/septile.html
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 5:11 AM
    I ask the guy/girl who is saying me its a bullshit to try it once ..
    and ammaking their chart ,then some synastry with someone they would like to know about the relationship with him,
    then a composite,
    but almost never there is a need in the composite,
    when the fella just openz his/her mouth and says :"Tis` great~!! :O "

    aha!!



    Adriana*
    I always prove the truth of what I Say even if before that I myself believed it was a bullLLshit ...LOL
    • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Fri, October 3, 2008 - 5:52 AM
      "ven if before that I myself believed it was a bullLLshit ...LOL "

      I also approached astorlogy with the view of studying it to prove it wrong (like you do when you're an air sign and have a first house Saturn). My thoughts were 'this is nonsense, but it is only scientific if I study it in the methods that astrology itself suggested, and then see whether there is anything to it or not'. Well the proof was in the pudding and I do believe that there is something to it. Whether or not the modern day meanings behind the houses, planets and aspects are 'real' I do not know. But there is definitely some correlation betwen the stars and our personalities. I do not do Horary much (or at all) so I only really know anything about natal chart astrology if that makes sense. I personally feel that the divinatory forms of astrology are what bring it so much dis-repute. People associate astrology with reading their future and people like to believe they are 100% in control of their lives. THey build their foundations upon it. Anything that might rock those foundations, gets dismissed.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Fri, October 3, 2008 - 5:12 AM
    I do not care what they say.
    I know I am right.
    So what for to sweat ?



    Regards,
    Dr.R
    • Z
      Z
      offline 118

      Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

      Fri, October 3, 2008 - 3:31 PM
      "Science has become the new method for establishing "truth" and anything that doesn't make sense to the scientific method is seen as illusion and superstition. I'm always leery of people with too much of a scientific bent. They tend to come off as soul-less."

      Well put!
      • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

        Sun, October 5, 2008 - 11:38 AM
        'They tend to come off as soul-less.'

        They quite often do! However to be drawn into a profession that aims to learn more about the world, the universe and mysteries of life I think would hint toward a soul-ful curiosity that may underline their outward personalities. A soulfullness that I believe they either fear or are afraid to reveal even to themselves.
        I personally feel that many (obviously not all) scientists and in fact atheists are actually people who are drawn deeply toward the mystery of the soul but are either too scared of their own power, or too scared of this mystery to accept it openly as to do so brings it into question, and may undermine their own feelings of security. Far better to protect the heart and their own hopes to come to terms now with the 'reality' that there is nothing out there. Far easier is it to control our own disappointment that way.
        Even Darwin prayed.

        I believe that too much or too much or too little Air or Water can cause this complex. Fire is more obvious, but I believe that this element accounts for those who simply don't care about the subject at all. They intuitively are aware of their own supremecy, they just forget that everyone else is just as supreme.
        • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

          Sun, October 5, 2008 - 5:54 PM
          They quite often do! However to be drawn into a profession that aims to learn more about the world, the universe and mysteries of life I think would hint toward a soul-ful curiosity that may underline their outward personalities. A soulfullness that I believe they either fear or are afraid to reveal even to themselves. "

          Ah, I see you now Paul, thanks for your chart. We are kindred spirits, yes? My error for using the pharse 'ableit Soulless." But a true Gemini would underscore the word "albeit." had there not been so much Leo in the way :-) Mucho Kudos to you, I love to be corrected ;-)
          • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

            Sun, October 5, 2008 - 6:31 PM
            For anyone who does not understand a true Gemini Soul, we really, truly want to learn -- And we are not easily given to bullshit. Some of us have a more 'diplomatic' nature than others, but we have this underlying need...to learn. We're only recently become aware of what we'll allow in our so very 'inquisitive' sphere.
            • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

              Sun, October 5, 2008 - 8:00 PM
              Gemini's are sooo soul-less . lol!
              Just kidding.

              Personally I get along with Gemini prominent people quite well indeed...and don't find aanlaytical people to be lacking in emotion unless of course they're sociopaths and then well I give 'em wide berth...no matter their charts.
  • Re: How Socially Acceptable is Astrology ?

    Mon, October 6, 2008 - 4:48 AM
    Is Palin of cosmic importance? Hillary and Palin have dangerous nature which will lead to WW3 waged and lost. On the other hand Ron Paul is a winner. Obama should not be given any legislature, of course. There are so little honest horoscopes in the world, that it is amazing to find them in politicians.

    Palin's "Drac", the new vampire object in astrology enters Ophiuchus from Scorpius below, that is, a borderline case. what is taken as granted is enlisted as follow.

    The position affects the following basic points in astrology

    * Killer galaxy
    * Stargate of Hell
    * Galactic center
    * Axis of Evil

    Palin's Drac is bracketed ( today by the Moon ) by Pluto, 2002 MS2, Quaoar, Crantor, Jupiter, Ixion and objects of interest in Serpens and Ophiuchus.

    As for wold economy collapse, if 2002 AW197 presented Alaska to the U.S.A., ...

    lulu.com/astrology

    P.S.

    The apparently much spoken of galaxy center is located next to Palin's Drac on the border formed between Scorpius, Ophiuchus and Sagittarius.

    P.P.S.

    It is important that children know their natal sky. Thus Alice has Hydra rising, Moon in Cetus, mercury in Sextans, Venus in Orion, Juno in Scutum and Pluto in Serpens Cauda. Many kids were born with outstanding talents, not only in August 2004; they are being born now on this intensive Stargate day. It is our duty to inform and work with children, to help them reject psyche and keep to true mind.

    In earnest,

    Klaudio Zic

Recent topics in "Astrology"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Astrodating mer m ISis 1 Today, 3:44 AM
Drakkar Vidamésse de... 1 Today, 3:42 AM
Taurus midheaven Ava 17 Today, 3:35 AM
Zodiacal Info Vidamésse de... 5 Today, 3:28 AM