I've been thinking about this for quite some time.
I have some serious doubt about Mercury being the ruler. If I think about all the famous people with Gemini influence, spanning from the likes of Bob Dylan to Marilyn Monroe as well as Kafka and Rousseau, I see Uranus and not mercury.
It's the doing or thinking in new ways (Uranus) and also paving the way for new ways of thinking, kind of revolting against old standards or atleast bringing it to new shapes. Also the youthfulness that actually is Uranus that we see in people like Marilyn Monroe and other Geminian.... Starlets, if you will.
Gemini people (not talking about the sun but either sun or many planets in the sign) do often have that quality of doing something new that I don't see as a trait in Mercury.
I also think that Uranus is a thinking planet, it's the inventor planet and therefore it has an intellectual side. Although I'd say it's more action oriented and outbursting than Mercury in its nature, and not to forget - more youthful.
Now, what do you think about this?
I have some serious doubt about Mercury being the ruler. If I think about all the famous people with Gemini influence, spanning from the likes of Bob Dylan to Marilyn Monroe as well as Kafka and Rousseau, I see Uranus and not mercury.
It's the doing or thinking in new ways (Uranus) and also paving the way for new ways of thinking, kind of revolting against old standards or atleast bringing it to new shapes. Also the youthfulness that actually is Uranus that we see in people like Marilyn Monroe and other Geminian.... Starlets, if you will.
Gemini people (not talking about the sun but either sun or many planets in the sign) do often have that quality of doing something new that I don't see as a trait in Mercury.
I also think that Uranus is a thinking planet, it's the inventor planet and therefore it has an intellectual side. Although I'd say it's more action oriented and outbursting than Mercury in its nature, and not to forget - more youthful.
Now, what do you think about this?
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Fri, May 9, 2008 - 2:11 AMAbout uranus influence on some of this gemini creatures, i know
that Bob Dylan has moon uranus conjunction, and Marilyn Monroe had moon in aquarius -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Sat, May 10, 2008 - 12:58 AMYes, although Dylan didn't only have his sun conjunct Uranus but Saturn too which makes it take a different spin. You're right about that but I still doubt Geminis original ruler.....
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Sat, May 10, 2008 - 2:19 AMThere are many different systems of rulership.
We can start off with the more common method of dividing a sign into decanates, or 3 ten-degree sections. Using this method, Gemini as a whole is ruled by Mercury. However, the second decanate is also flavored by Libra, and thus Venus, while the third decanate is flavored by Aquarius, and thus Saturn and Uranus. Being born with the Sun in this decanate, I've always had a particular fondness for Aquarian people, and been a bit of a rebel, but Mercury is definitely my primary ruler.....honest!
Another rulership system was taught by Alice Anne Bailey, where each sign had three different levels: Mundane, Esoteric and Hierarchical.
According to her, Gemini's rulers in those three levels were, respectively, Mercury, Venus, and Earth. Uranus was the Mundane ruler of Aquarius, the Esoteric ruler of Libra, and the Hierarchical ruler of Aries.
Then there are those that believe that only the traditional planets rule signs. These astrologers do not see Uranus, Neptune or Pluto ruling any signs.
There are also those who add more bodies into the stew. Take Ceres, for example. When first discovered, it was called a planet, then demoted to asteroid, then promoted to dwarf planet. Some astrologers feel that this body rules Virgo. Chiron is given by some astrologers as rulership over Virgo, by others over Libra, by some over Sagittarius, and a few even add it to Scorpio. Along these lines, there are astrologers who have added several other minor planets as having partial rulership over different signs. It has been hypothesized that Aquarius gets its unconventional nature, not from Uranus, but from the fact that the asteroid Damocles spends most of its orbit in that one sign....giving Aquarians the feeling that they never know when the other shoe is going to drop. And the asteroid Pallas is named after a Goddess of Wisdom who was born from her father's head.....a 'brain child', as it were, and is often described ad representing one’s capacity for creative wisdom and original perception. Some have given this body to Gemini.
There are several astrologers who feel that the Earth rules Taurus, and that a yet-undiscovered body past Pluto (Carl Payne Tobey called this body Planet Z) rules Gemini. Planet Z supposedly takes 900-1000 years to orbit the Sun.
You mentioned Bob Dylan and Marilyn Monroe, Kafka and Rousseau. But I can think of some very un-Uranian Gemini people, and some very Uranian people of other Sun Signs. British Queen Victoria, the longest-reigning monarch in English history, was a Gemini, who
displayed a personality marked by strong prejudices and a willful stubbornness that was much unlike typical Gemini or typical Uranians.
Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle, though a medical doctor, is much more widely known for his stories of Sherlock Holmes who had an acute sense of deductive reasoning that was in many ways more like a Scorpio than a Gemini, and certainly not Uranian.
Non-Gemini's who were Uranian? Let's take, for example, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, a document declaring a very daring and Uranian event. Benjamin Rush was a Sagittarius. John Adams was a Scorpio. John Hancock, who made a point of signing his name so large that he stood out even among the other 55 revolutionaries, was a Capricorn. Samuel Adams was a Libra, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Harris were both Aries, and Stephen Hopkins was a Pisces. In fact, William Hooper was the only signer known to be a Gemini (although there were 9 signers with birthdates unknown.) Known to be Aquarians were Abraham Clark, Joseph Hewes, Robert Morris and John Witherspoon....so at least these few lived up to their Aquarian revolutionary sign.
Anyway.....
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Sat, May 10, 2008 - 8:00 AMWell, thank you for your thourough response. Unfortunately I don't really follow on everything you mention, there was a lot of people there that I don't know of.
I've studied decans and I don't find them to be very useful.
As for asteroids I've noticed that Chiron and Ceres actually seems to be of some importance, for instance inherited patterns among families and other things, as well as maybe some other asteroids, but this wasn't really what the topic was about.
I don't think it's possible for an asteroid to outweigh, let's say, Uranus (about the 'what governs Aquarius' subject).
Like I said, I'm not convinced that Uranus would be the ruler of Gemini, but I'm 50-50, possibly a bit over, atleast in this period of time. -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Sat, May 10, 2008 - 11:36 AMI have thought about my Gemini sun. It's opposes my Uranus. So I think it is a merge of Mercurian and Uranuian energies but Gemini is stilled ruled by Mercury. Does anyone have Gemini in 11th House or Aquarius in 3rd house?
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 9:03 AMHi Zane,
Thanks for your post, it is very insightful...What do you think of the following: As there are currently 12 signs, shouldn't there be 12 planetary rulers? Through time every discovery of the Trans-saturnal planets has appointed them to their rightful signs and activated their energies by making our minds receptive to them? Doesn't it make the others signs left sharing a ruler ready to be ruled by their natural ruler?
You suggested Taurus to be ruled by Earth which makes great sense to me, allthough I must admit that (if and when) Vulcan's discovery would complicate matters even more, is it more compatible with Taurus or Virgo? In my opinion Virgo's analytical and sometimes cold scientific approach (to seperate things) resounds more with Vulcan, though on a symbolical level more with Earth, as Virgo being pregnant, expecting the (re-)birth of a planet's consciousness. Taurus seems more sympathetic to gravity, the objective world, nature and karma, so perhaps Earth is the best candidate.
As for Mercury fuling Gemini, this is evident. They are both dualistic, airy, flowing energies. I understand why a lot of people confuse mercury with Uranus, as they are very intimatly linked. One could say that Uranus starts where Mercury ends. I guess in Ancient times, before the scientific discovery of Uranus, mercury held a lot of Uranic energy and connotations.
What do you think? -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 7:06 PMPetros asked: "...What do you think of the following: As there are currently 12 signs, shouldn't there be 12 planetary rulers? Through time every discovery of the Trans-saturnal planets has appointed them to their rightful signs and activated their energies by making our minds receptive to them? Doesn't it make the others signs left sharing a ruler ready to be ruled by their natural ruler?"
I have mixed feelings about this. (Leave it to a Gemini to have contradictory feelings!)
I look back at the original rulers, and see how logical a system they had. Except for the Sun and Moon, each known planet had two signs (a day sign, and a night sign.) Nice, balanced. Uranus through the whole even system out of joint, Neptune and Pluto even moreso. It would be really nice to see every sign have a pair of rulers....to balance the system again. Or if not, then all the signs on one half of the zodiac have dual rulership, from Libra thru Pisces. The primal signs (Aries-Virgo) in that case would have only one ruler.
But on the other hand, I wonder if my desire to impose order is ludicrous. Who's to say we won't discover one day that some sign has a pack of rulers? Maybe the universal order looks a lot different, and we can't pigeonhole the signs so each one has the same number of rulers.
"You suggested Taurus to be ruled by Earth which makes great sense to me, allthough I must admit that (if and when) Vulcan's discovery would complicate matters even more, is it more compatible with Taurus or Virgo?"
IF there is an actual body Vulcan, I think we'd have to study it for a long while before we could decide a rulership. (I like Eris as co-ruler of Libra but I'm years away from promoting this.....way too much studying to do.) We can hypothesize, but at the moment, I think it's all we can do. Still, it's a fun exercise.
When I think of Vulcan, two things come to mind. One is this muscular craftsman, working hard at his forge, creating fantastic creations out of the very earth. For some reason, I have difficulty giving that image over to Virgo....I see it more as a Taurus.
The other is Vulcan was married to Venus, but his wife found him unattractive and had affairs with Mars. Here, I find it difficult to give it to Taurus, because that would make the two rulers of the sign married to each other.
Anyway, Earth is not hypothetical, so I still like Earth/Taurus. -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 9:47 PMMy Sun in Gemini is opposite my Uranus in Sag. I'm awesome. -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 5:27 AMLeo ascending? ;)
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 5:23 AMThanks for suggesting to look at myth as a way to find analogies with planets and signs...I wonder whether ancient civilisations fashioned their myths after the heavens, or vice versa.
<When I think of Vulcan, two things come to mind. One is this muscular craftsman, working hard at his forge, creating fantastic creations out of the very earth. For some reason, I have difficulty giving that image over to Virgo...>
Really? I think this image is perfect for Virgo, most of them I know are meticulous, adept in planning, designing and building things.
Very creative and focussed when working to shape an idea into matter. They share tenacity and will-power with Capricorn but are more modest.
I agree about Earth, now I'm thinking about it...Earth is the objective realm of matter, but can be a place subject to many illusion due to our projections. Taurus is intimatly connected to Nature=visible spirit, spirit=invisible nature.
Earth is the most dense plane of existence: Taurus is fixed Earth. Also, if you look at each sign opposition, they seem to balance eachother's function, so are their rulers. As for Taurus, I once read that Pluto is the antithesis of Earth...an agent of death and rebirth, Taurus as well as the Earth seem to deal with enlivening, creating form out of spirit:
ARIES: Mars-stimulating
LIBRA: Venus-harmonizing
TAURUS: earth-manifesting spirit in matter through desire
SCORPIO- Pluto: transforming matter into spirit through desire
GEMINI-Mercury: contrast
SAGITTARIUS-Jupiter: synthesis
CANCER-Moon: reactive-open
CAPRICORN-Saturn: active-limited
LEO-Sun: centripedal
AQUARIUS-Uranus: centrifugal
VIRGO-Vulcan: using form
PISCES-Neptune: desolving form -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 7:52 AMI am 6th house Sun Conj Mars, and Saturn in Aquarius with Leo 29'27" Asc...Uranus Conj Pluto in Virgo. My Moon is in Taurus 9th house, and Mercury in Capricorn...
My mother is Gemini Sun 9th house with Mercury Conj Uranus in Taurus, 8th house.
I just wanted to thank you guys for clearing up some communication issues we seem to have...Lets let Aquarius keep Uranus...
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 11:29 AMI am a silent, sometimes reader of this thread and thought i would jump in on this one and offer a comment.
I find that the concept of planetary octaves is most interesting and can offer insights into the relationships between the outer and the inner planets. They line up like this:
~Pluto is the higher octave of Mars and rules or influences the physical realm
~Neptune is the higher octave of Venus and rules the emotional realm (this pair is a particularly good one for understanding how the octaves work as both rule Love--Neptune ruling unconditional or spiritual love and Venus ruling personal or "earthly" love).
~AND Uranus is the higher octave of Mercury and rules the mental realm. Here, Mercury rules the lower mental body, or our "everyday" consciousness, thoughts, etc. whereas Uranus rules the "higher" mental where things such as problem solving, invention and even genius reside or originate.
The interplay and conscious interaction between the inner and outer planet of each pair is one way that we access the higher dimensions of our own being. They can be especially significant in the natal chart, and get activated by transit or progression.
btw, I have sun/moon/mercury in Gem.
~Elizabeth
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 12:31 PM"Really? I think this image is perfect for Virgo, most of them I know are meticulous, adept in planning, designing and building things.
Very creative and focussed when working to shape an idea into matter. They share tenacity and will-power with Capricorn but are more modest."
It's probably because, in part, we form our perception of the signs from people we know. Almost every Virgo I know is involved in something using their brain rather than their brawn.
When I think of Vulcan, I don't think of an intellectual type, but some of my favorite astrologers have been Virgo (although we often disagree up and down on methodology!). Through his identification with the Hephaestus of Greek mythology, Vulcan was seen as the creator of arms, iron, and armor for gods and heroes, including the thunderbolts of Jupiter; he made the thrones of the gods on Olympus as well. I've always pictured him with huge muscles, hammer and anvil, fires burning, using force to shape the raw materials into swords, and other things.
But I sometimes forget that Vulcan was not just brawn. He took clay, at Zeus' request, and built Pandora out of it to give to Epimetheus. Something like that would have taken someone with precision skills....definitely Virgo as a possibility.
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Fri, June 6, 2008 - 7:02 AMI agree, a person reflects some of the attributes of a sign but seldomly incorporates the pure archetypical energy. For me, Virgo - like all earth signs - deals with the need to give a structured (sometimes physical, sometimes mental) expression to a creative impulse. To shape it.
Taurus and Virgo feature prominently in charts of Artists (Vulcan-artisan). It is one thing to conceive an idea, another to give objective form to it...lots of people are creative (fire types), few have the necessary skill and discipline that Vulcan seems to bestow. Another factor in the proces of objectivation is detachment, something can only be identified and clarified in objective terms when it is isolated, another trait Vulcan seems to incorporate...very noticable in Virgo...He works alone...repititiously, in all modesty. Almost Saturnine...
-
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 8:27 AMZane,
Earth does make a lot of sense as ruler of Taurus. That's the first I'd heard anyone speculate that--but I had always wondered why Earth wasn't associated with any of the signs. Is it because we are looking at the skies from the perspective *of* Earth, and therefore we don't perceive as Earth moving through the constellations????
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Thu, June 5, 2008 - 11:23 AM"Is it because we are looking at the skies from the perspective *of* Earth, and therefore we don't perceive as Earth moving through the constellations???? "
Yes, primarily.
Earth for Taurus has been bantered around for quite some time....I'm not sure who suggested it first. But since the houses are based on standing here on Earth, looking up and around, a lot of people can't see Earth as an option.
Another reason is that Earth will ALWAYS be in the exact opposite sign from the Sun, so some people find that to be a reason not to put it into charts. But if one thinks about Taurus is FIXED EARTH, what can be more fixed than a body that always has the same relationship to the Sun?
I've always liked the thought that I have the Earth at 26 Sagittarius....it means my Earth is conjunct the Galactic Center. Since I have Taurus on the cusp of the third, if Earth co-rules that sign, then I've got the ruler of the GC conjunct the ruler of my house of the mind, and communication. Makes me smile everytime I think about it, considering how much I like to think/talk/write about astrology, and the universe around us. ;)
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Mon, May 12, 2008 - 9:30 AMOne of the things that originally attracted me to Vedic astrology was a return to the traditional planetary lordships. Every astrologer prior to the discover of Uranus, whether Vedic or Greek or whatever, used this system. What I love about it is its symmetry. Every planet rules two signs, except the Sun and the Moon, which rule one sign each. The signs of the Sun and the Moon show the symmetrical division, so you end up with a lunar and solar half of the zodiac, sort of like the inhale and exhale of the solar system. From there, the planets go in order from closest to the Sun to furthest from the Sun.
Lunar Half (inhale of solar system):
Aquarius - Saturn
Pisces - Jupiter
Aries - Mars
Taurus - Venus
Gemini - Mercury
Cancer - Moon
Solar Half (exhale of solar system):
Leo - Sun
Virgo - Mercury
Libra - Venus
Scorpio - Mars
Sagittarius - Jupiter
Capricorn - Saturn
I think we are in an exciting time in astrology with a lot of experimentation, innovation, and personal creativity. I think it's great to experiment with different possibilities and to see which ones work by putting them into practice and really testing them. But I also think it's important for astrologers to learn this traditional system of lordships and really understand it. In my opinion, there is a lot of wisdom in this system. There has to be if that's what all astrologers used for thousands for thousands of years!
Eventually I want to study the outer planets and learn more about them. But in my mind, using the outer planets in astrology is still an ongoing human experiment. Astrology as a science took thousands of years to evolve, maybe more. So only time will tell what the outer planets are really up to.
David
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Tue, May 13, 2008 - 1:15 AMi think that you should read up on hermes (mercury)... if you haven't. you'll see that he was extremely inventive/creative, rebellious, and youthful... he has alot of qualities that are very similar to those associated with uranus. -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Tue, May 13, 2008 - 5:29 AMUranus enters Orion prior to Gemini and the Moon enters both Orion (WTC, Usama) and Auriga, prior to Gemini. Prior to establishing priority, studying the real sky, just in case it is fun. Sincerely, lulu.com/astrology BTW the Sun is soon in Orion. -
-
trying to stay on topic
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 2:51 AM22, this thread is about the planetary rulership of Gemini. Any thoughts on that, or perhaps what the platetary ruler of Orion may be? I think you've made your point that there is a whole new system of astrology out there, but most of us probably can't afford the books that you've been spamming about on various (unrelated) tribes for the past week. Maybe you'd care to share some of your understandings of this "academic" system, before too many more of us die or get divorced on account of the "false" system we've been using all of our lives. Better yet, you could start a tribe for people who might actually be INTERESTED in learning something about this new system. At the very least, you might make some effort to stick to the topics of the threads that you keep spamming. If you've got a new topic, start a new thread. For example, you could tell us something about the SIGNIFICANCE of planets passing over some of the other 10 constellations that you mention.
-
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Tue, June 3, 2008 - 4:43 AMYOur discussion and the question you are arising here
are rather interesting,my dear..
Still we have to think about the similiarities that often take place in and between
some definite signs..
Indeed Hermes is very inventive and creative=new ways and innovations,also interests in experimentations,
so it is just ALIKE Uranus,but why Uranus itself..?
Then we can also compare others signs with their ruling planets ..
I have read once that the same element signs are often influenced
by the sign after!
But here we should get that Aquarius had to be like Gemini described,
and Gemini like Libra described...
Why I tell u this?
Cos there are lots of interpretations and descriptions in Astrology,
only them which are proved to be true,are acknowledged in the long run..
SO Cheers!Good that you are trying to discover something new :))))
Are u Gemini or Aquarius anyway ? :))))
I am Gemini myself.
I know Aquarius (not one),that are very innovative and non standard ppl ..
I am very creative and also Innovative in my ways of life :))))
Let`s judge together ;)
Would love if u add me -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Tue, June 3, 2008 - 5:27 AMAlas...if your theory is true, that explains my 7th house issues. lol. (It plopped its big butt down in there with my sun and chiron when I was born).
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Tue, June 3, 2008 - 5:44 AMAs someone with Uranus conjunct Mercury I can only agree that they are very alike.
Still...Uranus is the higher octave of mercury:
Uranus is universal, while mercury is international...Uranus is tolerant, while mercury is divisive. Mercury is fluid, while Uranus is etheric. Mercury is cunning, while Uranus perceives all. Mercury is a thief, while Uranus is the bestower of the mysteries. Mercury speaks all languages, while Uranus is telepathic. Mercury loves to play, while Uranus loves to transform. Mercury is critical, while Uranus synthesizes. Mercury is loquacious, while Uranus is sagacious. Mercury imitates, while Uranus creates. Mercury is changeable, while Uranus is beyond time. Mercury deals in money, Uranus deals in truth. Mercury loves gossip, Uranus embodies Freedom, Egality and Brotherhood. Mercury confuses, Uranus destroys ignorance. Mercury is restless while Uranus is of steady gaze. Mercury mediates, while Uranus is allready there.
All these archetypes are merely different manifestations on different levels of the same energy. We try to box them in and to practise astrology by analyzing a chart, while we should unfocus...and take a step back to let Uranus do his work: synthesizing all these modes of energy into a story beyond time. -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 12:55 AMTo: Petros
The comparison of Uranus and Mercury you shared seems accurate. I seem to experience these traits when the moon is in Aquarius. I am a Gemini, so it is like experiencing another level to me.
However, after reading your description, as a Gemini, I feel like I "just don't measure up". Surely, as there is an amazing expansion of Mercury to Uranus (just as there is an expansion of Uranus by Libra), there is an amazing effect on Uranus to Mercury. But, what is it?
-Kelly -
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 4:54 AMSorry if my post made you feel that way, it wasn't my intention. I just wanted to exaggerate the difference between them, as some people seem unable to appreciate it. I wasn't talking about people in any way...not about Geminis or Aquarians...if I was, Uranus would be painted so erratic and foolish that mercury would seem like the responsible one ;) (which he is in some ways) Planets are active on so many levels...As far as Geminis are concerned, this is my personal opinion:
<But about Geminis, it's difficult to keep up with them, but they are not superficial, at least...not in my book.
As for their annoying social style, it's very creative! trying to understand why people behave the way they do, is not superficial.
Furthermore, imagine that you are hooked on the mental mainframe 24/7 (AIR) and your job is too keep track of every thought, opinion, argument...intellectual snippet of information and to relate it and negate it...learn how thought and speech shape the world and transforming their experiences into deep wisdom. They are so devoted to the cultivation of wisdom they don't have time to contemplate, they need to speed of to it's everelusive source: the TAO. They are just the messengers...>
Mercury represents so many things and there is certainly a connection between him and Uranus as they both can be identified with Hermes and Budha (sanskrit name for mercury). They are the vehicles of enlightenment. Mercury can reflect (if taken under the wing of his big brother) some of his energy...before Uranus objective rediscovery, mercury and saturn would act as proxies of his energies.
I second what Exio said, earlier.
The crux of all this is... I guess the ego (sorry, folks). When serving it, mercury is trying to make sense ot the world by emphasizing the difference...this continual flux of creating contrast by mercury is fueled by the aversion-desire nature of the Moon. In this way the ego (Sun) creates a context where it can say: This is who I am.
Uranus does quite the opposite to the Ego (look at the axis Leo-Aquarius), he depersonalizes the Sun by saying: Look at all you could be if you would only let go of your moon (aversion-desire). All Transsaturnal planets want to do, is open our eyes to the rest of the Universe...
Making Uranus shine his light on mercury...hmmm, perhaps by creating space, mental space (meditation) for Uranus intuition to awaken...our conditioned minds (and moon) are so in flux...forming clouds, that there is no clear sky anymore for the sun to shine...
-
-
-
-
Re: Gemini ruled by Uranus and not Mercury?
Wed, June 4, 2008 - 8:54 AMI think that Uranus is too 'transpersonal' for the Gemini next door ~ Mercury, as a personal planet, is more appropriate
love all-ways,
mem