165 Degree Aspect

topic posted Wed, June 18, 2008 - 3:55 PM by  Zane

165 Degree Aspect
Mon, June 16, 2008 - 6:24 PM
Not long ago, I read a post on the web by an astrologer named Ricki Reeves, on an aspect she referred to as a Quindecile. Ricki wrote, ""Noel Tyl re-discovered this aspect while researching the horoscope of Leonardo da Vinci and, through hundreds of horoscopes, has confirmed it as a prominent indicator of obsession/compulsion as a response to upset and trauma in the life. He states, in his Analytical Techniques article of August, 1999 "The quindecile, with rulership routings to be respected as well, suggests a burning point of focus, often a place of extreme concern and effort in the life, even to the point of upheaval, disruption and obsessive mania.""

I had mixed feelings reading this because, while I'm glad someone is calling attention to this little used but important aspect, I'm a bit upset that she is giving Noel Tyl the credit for 're-discovering' it. While Noel Tyl did do a good bit of research on this aspect, he did not rediscover it.

Edward L. Johndro, born near the end of the 19th Century, wrote extensively about this aspect, although he did not give it a name. The venerable Charles Jayne also wrote quite a bit on it.

My friend Al H. Morrison was the one who told me about it. In 1981, he wrote to me that he had been using the 165 degree aspect for many years, having been taught about from Johndro himself in the early 1950's. He wrote that 'It is in the affairs of the houses tenanted by the planets in this aspect that the native has this unending capability of carrying on, continuing, in total disregard of all practical reality. There is nothing like the nagging persistence of the 165 degree aspect, just never say die, never stop trying, never give up on negotiating the non-negotiable.' He termed it the Johndro aspect, for want of a better name, and some people today still call it that.

Then, he suggested that I study Chiron in 165 degree aspect to various planets, which I then did, and published my initial findings in my book, "Essence and Application: A View From Chiron" in 1985. Since then, I have also studied it with many other planetary combinations not including Chiron, and have found it to be significant time and time again. So if I kindle a curiosity about this aspect with this post, please don't just look at Chiron, but your whole chart.

Note that some people feel Quindecile is a misnomer, saying that should properly be used for another aspect, 24 degrees.

Here is the excerpt from my book:

"I went through several hundred charts looking for Chiron in the 165^ aspect, and found an unusual pattern. In the charts of the famous and successful, some Chiron/165^ aspects came up very often while some planets were hardly ever related to Chiron by this arc.

The overall pattern I have found, when Chiron is 165^ to any planet, supports Al's description of persistence . But even more, it seems that the planet in this aspect to Chiron becomes much more active and much more visible as part of the person's image. This planet is the one that is the vehicle for the persistence. The person pushes, unendingly, with the aspected planet, while Chiron acts to part or overcome the obstacle in the way of the planet. Sometimes Chiron seems to create additional, unusual problems first which the person must resolve---and in so doing, develop more and more persistence in many different kinds of environment. This must be the 'teacher' facet of Chiron showing up.

Interestingly, Chiron was 165 to Mercury at the time of its discovery. Perhaps this is one reason we have been pushing so hard, so fast, to find out everything we can about Chiron as quickly as possible. And Chiron is 165^ the Sun in the chart for the Association for Studying Chiron---instilling the very purpose of the organization with this never-give-up attitude.

Here follows a brief tour of Chiron 165^ to the planets as searched so far. Please apply what follows to your charts, to see if you come up with similar results.

SUN 165^ CHIRON

Much enthusiasm, energy, and usually a great deal of optimism. Almost always described by others as being hard-working, with a tendency to experiment---to always look for alternative methods to accomplish their ends. But while they enjoy the new, they tend to resist, very strongly, any change imposed on them from outside!

EXAMPLES of people with Sun 165^ Chiron:

Chuck McKinley, William Rehnquist, Muhammad All. Wendell Willkie, Cornell MacNell, Arthur Schlesinger, Robert Smithson, Clifford Odets, O. Henry, Nlkola Tes1a, Guy Lombardo, Roger Moore, Norman Vincent Peale, Jimmy Carter, Michel Gauquelln. [Note: Francolse Gauquelin has Chiron 165^ Saturn]

MOON 165^ CHIRON

A tendency to be very charming and witty, full of ideas. A need to communicate is amplified, and it seems, so is the intelligence. Most seem to have the ability to lead others. Negatively there can be a tendency toward arrogance, even abusiveness, which must be watched. Very versatile as long as they choose to try new things---but a bit resistant to new things suggested by others.

EXAMPLES of people with Moon 165^ Chiron:

Michael Tilson Thomas, Leo Guild, Jack Past, Bob Gunton, William Huff man Stewart, Bert Convy, Kurt Russell, Lyndon B. Johnson, Ethel Merman.

MERCURY 165^ CHIRON

Here again there seems to be a great deal of intelligence, or at least the projection of being intelligent. Usually quite witty, with a powerful need to talk. Often described as quick thinking, or of 'having an answer for everything.' This type is hardworking, especially when involved In mental or communication pursuits.

EXAMPLES of people with Mercury 165^ Chiron:

Robert Bruce Mathlag, Robin Evan Roberts, Roger Staubach, Johnny Carson, Henry Cabot Lodge, David St. Clair, Bonnet Cerf, George C. Scott, George Harrison, Rich Little.

VENUS 165^ CHIRON

This aspect makes the person overly concerned with one or more aspects of Venus, pushing the planet right out in front of their list of priorities. For some this leads to an early love of money, possessions and .pleasure. For others it is love, and the concept of love. There is a great vulnerability to pain quite early in life. Some react by learning from it, some by projecting it outward as a desire to 'get even', and some go under, relishing their suffering.

EXAMPLES of people with Venus 165^ Chiron:

Thomas Otten Paine, Tom Poston, Richard Speck, Janis Joplin, Harry Tracy, Shah Pahlavi of Iran, Ray Stevens, Neil Diamond.

MARS 165^ CHIRON

Mars, in some form or another, seems to express the main thrust of the life. You can sense in most people who have this aspect a strong killer instinct, although it may be modified and channeled by other aspects. The basic tendency is to be unpretentious, straightforward, very active, firm and strong willed. These people always need challenges, always need to be active. While most seem to be aggressive, another type appears to hide aggressiveness to the point of elaborate, purposeful cover-up pretenses. This type presents self as very low-keyed, but the perceptive can sense within them the potential for attack.

EXAMPLES of people with Mars 165^ Chiron:

Louis Armstrong, Bill Mauldin, Yves Montand, Baron Manfred Von Richtofen, William Saroyan, Bela Lugosi, Jack Nicholson, Warren Beatty, Billy Carter, Roberta Coweli, Moses Gann, Ken Kesey, Bob Lilly, Otis Chandler, John Clifford, William Colby, Judy Collins, Wayne Embry, Kathryn Grayson, Craig Breedlove, Robert C. Byrd, Isaac Asimov, Princess Grace Kelly.

JUPITER 165^ CHIRON

These people are always in need of 'something'---always looking for answers. They must always go further, further, further. The sense of freedom is very strong, and there an accompanying hatred of any limitations imposed from outside.

EXAMPLES of people with Jupiter 165^ Chiron:

Anthony Joseph Foyt, Rex Harrison, Conrad Morlcand, Friedrich Nietzsche, Harry Tracy [see also Venus 165^ Chiron for this convicted murderer], Jan Fleming, Miguel Hidalgo.

SATURN 165^ CHIRON

These people initially have an unflagging curiosity, and as they get older, they either amplify it or repress it. Most are very tough under fire, down-to-earth people. Saturn for these individuals is a very powerful planet and they are always stressing it somehow. For some Saturn is externalized, and the person sees the world as a very miserable place or as a place full of enemies. For others Saturn is pursued as a goal, or chosen as a path, so that they become involved m uncovering the nature and structures of the larger environment. It is an excellent position for the researcher. Many personify the way most of us would like to be.

EXAMPLES of people with Saturn 165^ Chiron:

Yogi Berra, Joan Caulfleld, Hugh Downs, Clay l"elker, Robert Alan Good, Louis Groza, Robert Kastelmeier, Eleanor Parker, Garth Allen, Camille Flammarion, Alfred E. Housman, Dr. -Sam Sheppard, Gore Vidal, Judy Garland, Norman Lear, Lee Marvin, Francoise Gauquelin [see note under Sun 165^ Chiron].

CHIRON 165^ URANUS

These people refuse to submit individuality to any outside control. They feel compelled to 'do their own thing' no matter what.

EXAMPLES of people with Chiron 165^ Uranus:

Steve Cauthen, Paul Gauguin, Jay Waverly North, Craig Russell.

CHIRON 165^ NEPTUNE

There seems to be a concern with power here, but not in the Plutonian sense. The concern is with having enough power to change what something is to what they want it to be.

EXAMPLES of people with Chiron 165^ Neptune:

Mayor Richard J. Daley, Estes Kefauver, Don Ameche, David O. Selznlck, Walter Slezak.

CHIRON 165^ PLUTO

Here is where I need your help, dear reader. The only example I have found so far of this aspect is Richard DeMont, an athlete and champion swimmer, who has the dubious distinction of being the first Olympic participant ever to be disqualified from championship for the alleged use of drugs. Please send in the charts of other people who have this aspect, so we may find the positive expressions of it.

IC 165^ CHIRON

This aspect surprised me by being so much more prevalent than the aspect to the MC. Perhaps it is because this aspect puts Chiron only 15^ from the MC, thus making Chiron a very elevated planet? One common element seems to be a love of show, often manifested in a fondness for clothes. In any case, these people truly get into whatever role they are playing, and identify with it in a total sense. They always seem to make a big impression.

EXAMPLES of people with IC 165^ Chiron:

David Warren Bruebeck, John Renaldo Ottina, Sam Peckinpah, Jane Russell, Gay Talese, Jim Bailey, Herman Goering, Morgana King, Rick Springfield.

MC 165^ CHIRON

Since the only individual I have found so far with this aspect is General Frederick Carlton Weyand, who was Commander of American forces in South Viet-Nam, I will reserve judgement on the meaning of this aspect. Here is another plea for help from the reader.

ASCENDANT 165^ CHIRON

The ascendant, whatever sign it may be, is emphasized. The person projects the qualities of the rising sign more strongly than is usual, and always seems to make an impression on anybody they meet.

EXAMPLES of people with Ascendant 165^ Chiron:

Sandy Duncan, Claude Roy Kirk, Eddie Albert, Maurlce Ravel, Lana Turner.

DESCENDANT 165^ CHIRON

These people are usually quite thorough in their activities. They refuse to let other people alter their course of action, whatever it may be. They are often deeply involved in their work, which is often specialized or unusual.

EXAMPLES of people with Descendant 165^ Chiron

Bobby Stone, James Blish, Dr. Walter Koch, Vincent Price.

ONE FINAL THOUGHT ABOUT THE 165^ ASPECT Since it is rarely mentioned in astrological literature, it may be a good idea for us to investigate all other 165^ aspects in our charts involving planets other than Chiron. In this way we can get a better feel for the aspect itself, and will then be more able to understand what Chiron means when it is involved. I myself have Jupiter 165^ Saturn, and I am just beginning to fathom what that means for me.

Perhaps the biggest clue to its meaning will come from seeing it as a part of a whole aspect family: 165^ -- 11/24, 150^ = 10/24, 135^ = 9/24, 120^ = 8/24, et cetera. What do you think?"
posted by:
Zane
Atlanta
  • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

    Thu, June 19, 2008 - 11:27 PM
    What kind of orb do you give? I have Chiron 162^ from my Pluto and 169^ from my Venus. My Sun/Uranus conjunct is exactly 165^ from my Nadir. And Jupiter is 159^ from my Neptune (I'm assuming 6^ is a bit large of an orb for this aspect?).
    • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

      Thu, June 19, 2008 - 11:45 PM
      170 degrees is the maximum opposition most of the planetary combinations can ever achieve. Some can not achieve even that . e.g. Mars and Pluto can be at 170 degrees but I have never seen an opposition, though it might be theoretically possible. Eris and the Moon can not be opposed although in theory perhaps. Centaur Nessus is in Piscis Austrinus: it would take a search to find oppositions from the other part of the sky. For conjunctions note that planets can not e.g. conjunct Algol, but Eris can, since Eris normally ventures close to that star in Perseus.
      There is a lot to learn about conjunctions, a matter that has never been studied at all. Vivian Robson e.g. gives but vague hints, according to the superstition of his time. Many partners will rejoice on knowing that they do not have oppositions at all in their horoscopes, providing accurate calculus, the basis for a harmonious planet.
      • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

        Fri, June 20, 2008 - 12:23 AM
        Orbs were once used to cover for error. Nowadays we do not use orbs as we are precise enough: every man can have an observatory, which was not possible in the past to this degree. Orbs serve no purpose. The event happens exactly to the minute and second. For that we need no orbs. You can not say "The WTC will fall down around Mayan 2011:: you enter the data, obtain Eris on the western horizon, Moon X2 Orionis and there you have it to the minute. The same for market crash or real estate predictions. You do not move to New York with Moon in Orion, you move to Pittsburgh with Moon in Sextans, not just any Moon. as for aspects, when the Moon is in Auriga it can hardly make a 180 aspect with any planet close to the ecliptic but it can theoretically converge to 180 with eccentric objects like Venus and the centaurs. at t=his time the Moon can not oppose Nessus since Nessus is too low. That applies to Chiron which is not an astrological toy but very interesting when in e.g. Cetus with Eris and Pluto. There are some centaurs that glide near the ecliptic on occasion. For incipient study one should avoid judging opposition as concern the following objects: the Moon, (Mercury), Venus (Mars), Pluto and Eris is completely out of calculus. One can safely assume (with a minimal degree of error) that Saturn, and Neptune are in opposition, since they glide close to the ecliptic. This important topic has never been studied at all. In order to study it one must fIrst know the position of th planets, which requires some knowledge that is not available through the corner library, even Greenwich corner library, but is in fact at hand via Google Sky, Wiki Sky and other programs. It is good to calculate the position of the Sun first, as many astrologers never thought of that possibility. What worries is that such people harm their clients. We have published the ephemeris for the sUN AND THE mOON IN DETAIL, EVEN MINUTE ON TRIBE.NET FOR FREE (nasa EPHEMERIS). yOU WILL BE ABLE TO CORRECT FOR THE FAMOUS two sign error (NOT ONE BUT TWO SIGNS NOW) AND PROCEESD TO HOBBIES LIKE MARRAIGE PREDICTION OR CENTAURS. fOR ACCURATE PREDICTIONS ONE MUST FORST KNOW HIS OWN NATAL sUN POSITION. tHAT IS ACCEPTABLE AS WELL AS LEGAL. Sorry for the caps lock, I must hurry not time to correct, ciao.
        • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

          Fri, June 20, 2008 - 7:45 AM
          In Germany we have 11 8 18 and even 111 aspects called golden aspects, but what good do such eccentricities do to people how do not know their natal sun position? Think of this: what good is to compare two girls that are not there. Or cows, better compare cows, much more military fashion. You have not an idea of where your natal sun is, not nearly a guess. what good is to speculate on aspects? If I do not know where my natal Moon is and I refuse to compute the position for the natal Sun, what good any aspects? Did you know that so-called astrological programs (hmmmm) miss full moon for e.g. 2 days? The errors are TWO SIGNS. Two! Not half or so-called ayanamsha or ayanamsa (there are many theories but no uniform ayanamsa in the world of astrology), the error is TWO SIGNS and you do not know your natal sun sign. What good is pretending to be an astrologer? Or even draw out aspectarians? I posted the ephemeris for the Sun. It is the same ephemeris that Juan uses and SOLEX and NASA. It is within reach on your desktop and you do not know where your sun is. You are liable to damage your clients if one day you decide to make horoscopes for others. Forget dwarf planets and reach for the basics: get a sun ephemeris and study it. It is not easy job, I promise. and you will not receive any help from Hiparrchos, Ptolemy, Kepler, Nostradamus or Cassini. Savvy? God forbid that someone who does not know his natal sun attempt astrological analysis. That would be very foolish and he shall be punished. It is written in the Bible, also in the Vedas. NFRNTRSTWDNH om bam vatukaya aphadudaranaya kuru kuru vatukaya
          • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

            Fri, June 20, 2008 - 7:46 AM
            Noel Tyl? The idiot? You go to him to tell you where your planets are? He does not know it himself. I met him once, he is a fool.
            • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

              Fri, June 20, 2008 - 7:56 AM
              If you need a horoscope go to Bill Meridian, Rick Palsible. I'd go to Pasqualina or Derek Appleby but they seem to be dead? Hmm, Latvia, there is an Estonian guy who makes horoscopes, and programs astrolog. Latvia is near Estonia? His name is V.. something, nice guy makes charts programs astrolog program. Thge Scynthy and wendi love him, latvian or otherwise. Sorry am I on the right group here. Steinar, Shetejn, Latvian? Stalin was Grusian, Armenian church bellboy, Latvia should be compatible with estonia, ah, ask Juan he knows. Or Ed. Now thinking, There are three Swiss rpogrammers who can help you with that aspect of yours. Looks fatal.

              Ok do not travel as something unexpected is about to happen (dont need horoscopes to know that), you do not die of course, it would be too easy, something very timely happens in Latvia on full moon. Ok back to the Bible. Trust in God, avoid astrologers and be ye all good boys till I am back. Watch the backdoor.
              • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

                Fri, June 20, 2008 - 9:02 AM
                "Hmm, Latvia, there is an Estonian guy who makes horoscopes, and programs astrolog. Latvia is near Estonia? His name is V.. something" Here is a map of Latvia that shows two of its neighbours, Lithuania and Estonia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imag...atvia.pngI
                Notice among the names of towns and provinces that there are many beginning with the letter V. Maybe, though, his name is just Vladimir?
            • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

              Sun, June 22, 2008 - 12:08 AM
              Klaudio wrote:
              "Noel Tyl? The idiot? You go to him to tell you where your planets are? He does not know it himself. I met him once, he is a fool."

              Matthew 7:
              1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
              2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
              3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
              4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
              5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

              I know Noel Tyl.
              I do not see eye to eye with him on some things.
              But because we disagree does not make him a fool.

              I disagree with you on almost everything you write on Tribe. But I would never call you a Fool. Or any other such name-calling.

              But I do suspect that a person's character does reflect in the way they describe other people. What does it say about you, that you stoop to calling someone else a name?
              • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

                Sun, June 22, 2008 - 1:15 AM
                Wow, how did you guys get to meet these famous astrologers?

                I've been to Noel Tyl's website on horary and visited the discussion for many times. I think he seems to be very knowledgeable about astrology. I definitely wouldn't call him an idiot.

                Has anyone met Robert Hand?
    • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

      Fri, June 20, 2008 - 8:33 PM
      I usually give 165 only 1 degree; 3 degrees if Sun or Moon. But by all means, experiment. Sun/Uranus 165 Nadir? Intriguing....not sure yet how to interpret that......but I'll give it some thought
      • matrix hacking

        Fri, June 20, 2008 - 11:46 PM
        I use Internet for occult purpose, namely exorcism on planetary level. Here is the explanation:

        astronuts.tribe.net/thread/2...80af26446

        Thus astrology is mere a tool as there is not many of us to be saved, perhaps a few, 144 000. We know who is to survive.
        Others are doomed, they are not of our kind, sorry. hard to swallow this. These people shall not exist in 2011.
        2009 is subprime hard crisis, even mid June is another major one, perhaps not in the newspapers, but be assured.

        I inspected Valja is one Estonian guy. There is a java programmer in Switzerland who handles dwarf planets. another works in Debian Linux and ports rto MS Windoes. Nicholas Schroeder (have to check this) has centaurean astrolog ready since uhm year 2001 with all dwarf planets. Takes time to find him out on groups yahoo he has astrolog group something.

        astrolog.offline.ee/astrolog...tin.shtml valja is one then there are several developers in Swiss but this is old news I am afraid. The purpose is to lure out the devil at planetary level, that is exorcise the planet by offering true sky instead of superstition, well astrolog as program has in-built true skies thus you can see the centaurs where they really are and e.g. Sun in Ophiuchus (the much spoken of position_. All planets enter Ophiuchus, Orion and Cetus, not just the Sun.

        The purpose is to offer a planetarium program within the astrological one in order to check for real positions of the planets. This has been done with many programs, indeed I hear that even Solar Fore has an inbuilt planetarium?
        • Golden aspects Was:Re: matrix hacking

          Sat, June 21, 2008 - 12:02 AM
          Ed Falis site: mysite.verizon.net/vze6qirr/myindex.html

          Ed is a pioneer and programmer and goes well with Juan and astro.ch so compatible, uses Swiss ephe. The program calculated primary directions. I used it but when I do horoscopes which I o not have time, I am accustomed to calculate at a glance by heart, such is old astrology.

          The Academic Zodiac used to hang on wiki but the administration there is vexation.

          All you have to do to find out the real positions is use the programs you already have astrolog -F planetarium will show and Juan-s program has ephemeris, look into IAU. Also there are Sun and Moon precise ephemeris to the minute on (let me check) tribes.tribe.net/academic_zodiac these are NASA based.

          In the real sky the 180 aspect is rare. I never encountered it. Orbs were assigned because astrologers did not know this. As Juan says: we are not working with real skies at all.

          en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imag...atvia.pngI Nothing here. At any rate Juan Revilla has a program that can render the TRUE POSITIONS of the planet. People just have to use it. Thus when I speak of Nessus in Piscis Austrinus or Venus in Hydra it is within the program everybody has on his desktop but knows not how to use, amazing. Why did Juan put so much energy inside when people do not use it? Juan did not implement Sun in Orion or Cetus (at the time there was no theory) but you can inspect Sun in Ophiuchus. The program from Costa Rica is nothing else but the pleasurable rendering of NASA JPL model and subsequently SOLEX.

          There is a German program rendering 11 108 18 8 and even crazier aspects, as developed by an Osho initiate, but those golden aspects were meant for spiritual research only, hmmm. Don't know much about.

          There are 300 directions worth pursuing, but people do not even pursue primary direction. Why analyze the horoscope when it does not take an astrologer at all to calculate e.g. marriage in seconds> People are interested in quite a few things and everyone is able to tell all than loves in one's life in perhaps 20 minutes, This is easy. Yopu do not need a computer or ephemeris to tell when one is going to marry. You do not even need pen and paper. That is too easy.
          • Re: Golden aspects Was:Re: matrix hacking

            Sat, June 21, 2008 - 12:26 AM
            It is not clear why should astrologers develop astrological programs at all. Simple astronomic software tells no lies and does the job. SKYGLOBE is still relevant and in big use. It has no fancy aspectarian but at least you do not go for a lifetime thinking you are a Scorpio when you were born Virgo. It is dangerous not to know one;s own natal positions. But all in all towards 2011 we shall not have this problem at all. There will be no one to have it. Uranus is already entering Cetus, albeit the majority is not aware at all. They are left aside and lost forever.
            6 000 000 000 against 144 000 these are the real numbers that count.
        • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

          Sat, June 21, 2008 - 12:48 AM
          Interesting Zane. I am not sure how much input on it I can give you though.

          My Chiron is almost exactly 165º from Uranus and approx. 163º from the Midheaven.
          My Moon is about 164º from Uranus and a little over 162º from the Midheaven.
          Venus is 163º from Jupiter.

          I don't know about the obsessive / compulsive part which Noel Tyl described, but I do know that part of my 4th house Chiron wounding stems from my older sister being killed by a drunk driver when my Mom was driving her to a doctor, close to home. That is what started me on my spiritual search.

          It happened when I was just before the age of my Midheaven degree. When I went to a local astrologer in my late teens, he told me that the Ascendant and Midheaven degree usually show the age of an important event in your life, though it doesn't necessarily have to be traumatic. (I broke my left arm falling from a tree when i was the age of my Ascendant)

          My sister was 2 years older than me, and she had the same Sun opposition Neptune T-square to Uranus as I do in my chart, except hers is more exact, and Venus was also conjunct her Sun. That shows me the possibility of an accident from a drunk driver, and Venus is the ruler of the Sun sign. My venus is in the 8th house. My Mom was injured but she came out fine, but the incident kicked in my Capricorn Moon.

          My Uranus Midheaven has inventions and other things involved, but most of that is yet to be seen. You said you were looking for Ciron / Midheaven input, so I hope that helps.

          *note: your Chiron Neptune and your Chiron Pluto interpretations are switched around in the wrong place above.
      • Re: 165 Degree Aspect

        Sat, June 21, 2008 - 2:29 AM
        I do have to say that having my family "on my side" is very important to me... Taurus IC too, so I guess I'm pretty damn stubborn when it comes to family. I left behind some pretty amazing opportunities in an attempt to get my family to understand what I was moving toward. I'm the "gifted" child... my career path was supposed to be something like an arranged marriage. But I rejected the bride right off the bat. I've felt most of my life that my family has consistently worked against me... at least the "elders", Mom, Dad, and older brother... the younger ones are all right in my book.

        Obsessive? I guess obsessive enough to leave behind alot of support (and likely success) to try to gain the support of those who had never been from the beginning. And it's still a struggle for me. That would definitely be my nagging obsession.